Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27754419›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2016

Time of Day and Training Status Both Impact the Efficacy of Caffeine for Short Duration Cycling Performance.

James C Boyett, Gabrielle E W Giersch, Christopher J Womack, Michael J Saunders, Christine A Hughey, Hannah M Daley, Nicholas D Luden

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. International society of sports nutrition position stand: caffeine and exercise performance.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Caffeine and Exercise: What Next?Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James C BoyettHuman Performance Lab, Department of Kinesiology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA. boyettjc@dukes.jmu.edu.
Gabrielle E W GierschHuman Performance Lab, Department of Kinesiology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA. gierscge@dukes.jmu.edu.
Christopher J WomackHuman Performance Lab, Department of Kinesiology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA. womackcx@jmu.edu.
Michael J SaundersHuman Performance Lab, Department of Kinesiology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA. saundemj@jmu.edu.
Christine A HugheyDepartment of Chemistry, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA. hugheyca@jmu.edu.
Hannah M DaleyDepartment of Chemistry, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA. daleyhm@dukes.jmu.edu.
Nicholas D LudenHuman Performance Lab, Department of Kinesiology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA. ludennd@jmu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This project was designed to assess the effects of time of day and training status on the benefits of caffeine supplementation for cycling performance. Twenty male subjects (Age, 25 years; Peak oxygen consumption, 57 mL·kg

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceCircadian RhythmDietary SupplementsAdolescentAdultBicyclingCaffeineDouble-Blind MethodHumansMalePhysical Conditioning, HumanPhysical Education and TrainingTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCaffeinecaffeine supplementationdiurnalexercise time of daytraining historytraining status

Identifiers

PMID27754419
PMCPMC5084026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.