Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27754364›Full record

ReviewVaccines2016

Influenza and Memory T Cells: How to Awake the Force.

Jan Spitaels, Kenny Roose, Xavier Saelens

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Broadly active intranasal influenza vaccine with a nanocomplex particulate adjuvant targeting mast cells and toll-like receptor 9.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Cytotoxin-Associated Gene A-NegativeFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Noninvasive Immuno-PET Imaging of CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jan SpitaelsMedical Biotechnology Center, VIB, Ghent 9000, Belgium. jan.spitaels@vib-ugent.be.
Kenny RooseMedical Biotechnology Center, VIB, Ghent 9000, Belgium. kenny.roose@vib-ugent.be.
Xavier SaelensMedical Biotechnology Center, VIB, Ghent 9000, Belgium. xavier.saelens@vib-ugent.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Annual influenza vaccination is an effective way to prevent human influenza. Current vaccines are mainly focused on eliciting a strain-matched humoral immune response, requiring yearly updates, and do not provide protection for all vaccinated individuals. The past few years, the importance of cellular immunity, and especially memory T cells, in long-lived protection against influenza virus has become clear. To overcome the shortcomings of current influenza vaccines, eliciting both humoral and cellular immunity is imperative. Today, several new vaccines such as infection-permissive and recombinant T cell inducing vaccines, are being developed and show promising results. These vaccines will allow us to stay several steps ahead of the constantly evolving influenza virus.

Indexed as

cellular immunityinfluenzamemory T cellsvaccines

Identifiers

PMID27754364
PMCPMC5192353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.