Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27753704›Full record

ArticleJournal of lower genital tract disease2017

Multimodal Vulvar and Peripheral Sensitivity Among Women With Vulvodynia: A Case-Control Study.

Barbara D Reed, Ananda Sen, Sioban D Harlow, Hope K Haefner, Richard H Gracely

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of lower genital tract disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Evaluation and Treatment of Vulvodynia: State of the Science.Journal of midwifery & women's health · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Provoked vestibulodynia: current perspectives.International journal of women's health · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara D Reed1Department of Family Medicine, 2Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, 3Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, 4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and 5School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Ananda Sen
Sioban D Harlow
Hope K Haefner
Richard H Gracely
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Characterization of Pain Processing in VulvodyniaR01HD045661 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI REED, BARBARA D · 2005 to 2009
$1.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD045661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess differences in vulvar and peripheral sensitivity between women with and without vulvodynia.

methodsWomen with vulvodynia (n = 41) and age-matched controls (n = 43) seen in the outpatient setting were evaluated via surveys, clinical examination, and multimodal sensory testing (pressure, heat, cold, vibration, and electrical stimulation). The relationships between sensitivity to various sensory modalities and case/control status, as well as by vulvodynia subgroups, were assessed using logistic regression.

resultsWomen with vulvodynia were more sensitive to pressure and to electrical stimuli than were control women at the vulva (median, 22 vs 230 g and 0.495 vs 0.769 mA, respectively; P < 0.001 for each) and at the thumb (median, 2500 vs 4250 g and 0.578 vs 0.764 mA, respectively; P = 0.006 for pressure, P < 0.001 for electrical stimulation). Heat, cold, and vibration detection thresholds did not differ significantly between these groups (P > 0.025). Those reporting spontaneous pain versus provoked pain had greater pressure sensitivity to the thumb (median, 1850 vs 2690 g; P = 0.020) and greater electrical sensitivity at the introitus (0.450 vs 0.608 mA; P = 0.011), and those with primary versus secondary vulvodynia had substantially greater pressure sensitivity to the thumb (median, 2438 vs 3125 g, P = 0.004). However, having localized versus generalized vulvodynia was not associated with differences in pressure or electrical sensitivity.

conclusionsSensitivities to pressure and electrical stimuli are greater among vulvodynia cases than among controls and support 2 previously defined subgroups-those reporting spontaneous pain versus those whose pain only occurred when provoked, and those with primary versus secondary vulvodynia.

Indexed as

Sensory ThresholdsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOutpatientsVulvodyniaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27753704
PMCPMC5182115
OpenAlexW2528111680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.