Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27753146›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2017

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate mofetil in younger and elderly renal transplant recipients.

Jiang-Tao Tang, Brenda C de Winter, Dennis A Hesselink, Ferdi Sombogaard, Lan-Lan Wang, Teun van Gelder

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiang-Tao TangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Brenda C de WinterDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dennis A HesselinkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ferdi SombogaardDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lan-Lan WangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Teun van GelderDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsElderly transplant recipients have a lower incidence of acute rejection, and a higher risk to die from infectious complications. A potential cause may be differences in the pharmacokinetics (PK) or pharmacodynamics (PD) of the immunosuppressive drugs they are taking. This study was designed to comprehensively evaluate the influence of age on the PK and PD of mycophenolic acid (MPA).

methodsIn this study the PK and PD of MPA was studied in 26 elderly and 54 younger renal transplant recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus. Patients were sampled repetitively, both before and during the first 6 months after kidney transplantation. Age-related variability in MPA PK, baseline IMPDH activity, as well as MPA-induced IMPDH inhibition were studied.

resultsThe IMPDH activity pre-transplantation did not differ between elderly and younger patients. Neither IMPDH activity pre-transplantation nor maximum IMPDH inhibition was significantly correlated with the patients' age. The area under the MPA plasma concentration-time curve (AUC

conclusionsAge did not significantly affect the PK or PD of MPA. It is unlikely that the lower incidence of acute rejection in elderly patients, or the higher risk to die from a severe infection in elderly patients is due to different handling of MPA in the elderly.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsArea Under CurveFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsIMP DehydrogenaseKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedMycophenolic AcidTacrolimusTime FactorsTransplant RecipientsYoung AdultImmunosuppressive AgentsIMP DehydrogenaseMycophenolic AcidTacrolimusinosine monophosphate dehydrogenase inhibitorkidney transplantationmycophenolic acidpharmacodynamicspharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID27753146
PMCPMC5346874
OpenAlexW2539304946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.