Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27752994›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology2017

Rodent Gymnastics: Neurobehavioral Assays in Ischemic Stroke.

Sreekala S Nampoothiri, Tanvi Potluri, Harshith Subramanian, Rajanikant G Krishnamurthy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sreekala S NampoothiriSchool of Biotechnology, National Institute of Technology, Calicut, 673601, India.
Tanvi PotluriSchool of Biotechnology, National Institute of Technology, Calicut, 673601, India.
Harshith SubramanianSchool of Biotechnology, National Institute of Technology, Calicut, 673601, India.
Rajanikant G KrishnamurthySchool of Biotechnology, National Institute of Technology, Calicut, 673601, India. rajanikant@nitc.ac.in.
National Institute of Technology Calicut · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite years of research, most preclinical trials on ischemic stroke have remained unsuccessful owing to poor methodological and statistical standards leading to "translational roadblocks." Various behavioral tests have been established to evaluate traits such as sensorimotor function, cognitive and social interactions, and anxiety-like and depression-like behavior. A test's validity is of cardinal importance as it influences the chance of a successful translation of preclinical results to clinical settings. The mission of choosing a behavioral test for a particular project is, therefore, imperative and the present review aims to provide a structured way to evaluate rodent behavioral tests with implications in ischemic stroke.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain IschemiaExploratory BehaviorHand StrengthMiceMotor ActivityRatsRotarod Performance TestStrokeBehavioralCognitiveIschemic strokeRodentsSensorimotor

Identifiers

PMID27752994
OpenAlexW2535168758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.