ArticleOecologia2017
Ontogenetic changes in sensitivity to nutrient limitation of tadpole growth.
Article in Oecologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shift of Nitrogen and Carbon Stable Isotopes in Temporary Pond Tadpoles Following the Decline of Large Mammalian Herbivores.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Life stage and taxonomy the most important factors determining vertebrate stoichiometry: A meta-analysis.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Interspecific homeostatic regulation and growth across aquatic invertebrate detritivores: a test of ecological stoichiometry theory.Oecologia · 2019Article
- Stoichiometry and Life-History Interact to Determine the Magnitude of Cross-Ecosystem Element and Biomass Fluxes.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to ecological stoichiometry (ES), the growth of a consumer with abundant resources should increase as body and resource stoichiometry become more similar. However, for organisms with complex life cycles involving distinct changes in biology, nutrient demands might change in response to ontogenetic changes in body stoichiometry. Tadpole growth and development has been found to be largely nitrogen (N) limited, as predicted for organisms developing N-rich tissues like muscle. However, tadpole metamorphosis includes periods of rapid development of phosphorus (P)-rich bones in preparation for a terrestrial lifestyle. We hypothesized that tadpole growth and development will exhibit variable nutrient demands during different stages of ontogeny, due to predictable changes in body tissue stoichiometry. To test this, we raised tadpoles on four diets with varying N:P ratios and assessed growth and developmental rates. Specifically, we predicted that tadpoles would be sensitive to N limitation throughout ontogeny (consistent with previous studies), but also sensitive to P limitation during the process of long-bone ossification. Consistent with our prediction, tadpole growth rates and development were sensitive to N limitation throughout ontogeny. Increased dietary N led to a shorter time to metamorphosis and a larger mass at metamorphosis. Also as predicted, growth rates were sensitive to both N and P during the period of peak bone ossification, indicative of co-limitation. These results indicate that P limitation changes through tadpole ontogeny consistent with, and can be predicted by, shifts in body tissue stoichiometry. Future studies should investigate whether ontogenetic shifts in tadpole P limitation lead to seasonal shifts in wetland nutrient cycling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27752780What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.