Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27752537›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2016

Modeling practice effects in healthy middle-aged participants of the Alzheimer and Families parent cohort.

Gonzalo Sánchez-Benavides, Juan D Gispert, Karine Fauria, José Luis Molinuevo, Nina Gramunt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gonzalo Sánchez-BenavidesBarcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.
Juan D GispertBarcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Karine FauriaBarcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.
José Luis MolinuevoBarcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.
Nina GramuntBarcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRepetitive administration of neuropsychological tests can lead to performance improvement merely due to previous exposure. The magnitude of such practice effects (PEs) may be used as a marker of subtle cognitive impairment because they are diminished in healthy individuals subsequently developing Alzheimer's disease (AD).

methodsTo explore the relationship between sociodemographic factors, AD family history (FH), and

resultsPEs were observed in all measures. Sociodemographic variables did not show a uniform effect on PE. Baseline score was the strongest predictor of change, being inversely related to PE magnitude. Significant effects of the interaction term DISCUSSION: PEs exert a relevant effect in cognitive outcomes at retest and, accordingly, they must be taken into consideration in clinical trials. The magnitude of PE in processing speed and working memory could be of special interest for the development of cognitive markers of preclinical AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseAPOECognitionFamily historyPractice effectsPreclinical

Identifiers

PMID27752537
PMCPMC5061467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.