ArticleEnvironmental sciences Europe2014
Conflicts of interests, confidentiality and censorship in health risk assessment: the example of an herbicide and a GMO.
Article in Environmental sciences Europe, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mapping commercial practices of the pesticide industry to shape science and policymaking: a scoping review.Health promotion international · 2025Article
- Strategic science translation in emerging science: genetically modified crops and Bisphenol A in two cases of contested animal toxicity studies.GM crops & food · 2022Article
- The Tragedy of Liberal Democratic Governance in the Face of Global Threats.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Retracting Inconclusive Research: Lessons from the Séralini GM Maize Feeding Study.Journal of agricultural & environmental ethics · 2015Article
- Public Submissions on the Uganda National Biotechnology and Biosafety Bill, 2012 Reveal Potential Way Forward for Uganda Legislators to Pass the Bill.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have studied the long-term toxicity of a Roundup-tolerant GM maize (NK603) and a whole Roundup pesticide formulation at environmentally relevant levels from 0.1 ppb. Our study was first published in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.