Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27752072›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2016

Circuit modules linking internal states and social behaviour in flies and mice.

David J Anderson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 165 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
165citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

165 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Fertility reversibly modulatesbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A single brief cue leaves a day-long internal state imprint in planarians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

105 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David J AndersonDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA.

Funding

Imaging neuromodulation in the brainR01DA031389 · NIDA · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ANDERSON, DAVID J · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Goal-directed social behaviours such as mating and fighting are associated with scalable and persistent internal states of emotion, motivation, arousal or drive. How those internal states are encoded and coupled to behavioural decision making and action selection is not clear. Recent studies in Drosophila melanogaster and mice have identified circuit nodes that have causal roles in the control of innate social behaviours. Remarkably, in both species, these relatively small groups of neurons can influence both aggression and mating, and also play a part in the encoding of internal states that promote these social behaviours. These similarities may be superficial and coincidental, or may reflect conserved or analogous neural circuit modules for the control of social behaviours in flies and mice.

Indexed as

DriveSocial BehaviorAggressionAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterHumansMiceModels, AnimalMotivationNerve NetNeuronsSexual Behavior, Animal

Identifiers

PMID27752072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.