Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27751941›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2017

Sources and implications of whole-brain fMRI signals in humans.

Jonathan D Power, Mark Plitt, Timothy O Laumann, Alex Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 315 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
315citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

315 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Global Signal Removal (GSR) as graph spatial filtering.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

255 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan D PowerNIMH, National Institute of Health, United States. Electronic address: jonathan.power@nih.gov.
Mark PlittNIMH, National Institute of Health, United States. Electronic address: mplitt@stanford.edu.
Timothy O LaumannWashington University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, United States. Electronic address: laumannt@wustl.edu.
Alex MartinNIMH, National Institute of Health, United States. Electronic address: alexmartin@mail.nih.gov.

Funding

The Neural Foundations for Memory and Social Cognition In The Human BrainZIAMH002588 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI MARTIN, ALEX · 2009 to 2025
$21.1M
The Cognitive Neuroscience of Autism Spectrum DisordersZIAMH002920 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI MARTIN, ALEX · 2009 to 2025
$14.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 MH999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole-brain fMRI signals are a subject of intense interest: variance in the global fMRI signal (the spatial mean of all signals in the brain) indexes subject arousal, and psychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia and autism have been characterized by differences in the global fMRI signal. Further, vigorous debates exist on whether global signals ought to be removed from fMRI data. However, surprisingly little research has focused on the empirical properties of whole-brain fMRI signals. Here we map the spatial and temporal properties of the global signal, individually, in 1000+ fMRI scans. Variance in the global fMRI signal is strongly linked to head motion, to hardware artifacts, and to respiratory patterns and their attendant physiologic changes. Many techniques used to prepare fMRI data for analysis fail to remove these uninteresting kinds of global signal fluctuations. Thus, many studies include, at the time of analysis, prominent global effects of yawns, breathing changes, and head motion, among other signals. Such artifacts will mimic dynamic neural activity and will spuriously alter signal covariance throughout the brain. Methods capable of isolating and removing global artifactual variance while preserving putative "neural" variance are needed; this paper adopts no position on the topic of global signal regression.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingArtifactsBrainBrain MappingDatabases, FactualHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID27751941
PMCPMC5321814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.