Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27751936›Full record

ReviewBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation2017

National Institutes of Health Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Late Effects Initiative: The Immune Dysregulation and Pathobiology Working Group Report.

Juan Gea-Banacloche, Krishna V Komanduri, Paul Carpenter, Sophie Paczesny, Stefanie Sarantopoulos, Jo-Anne Young, Nahed El Kassar, Robert Q Le, Kirk R Schultz, Linda M Griffith and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Non-Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Juan Gea-BanaclocheExperimental Transplantation and Immunology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. Electronic address: banacloj@mail.nih.gov.
Krishna V KomanduriSylvester Adult Stem Cell Transplant Program, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida.
Paul CarpenterClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; University of Washington School of Medicine Pediatrics, Seattle, Washington.
Sophie PaczesnyIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Stefanie SarantopoulosDivision of Hematological Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University Department of Medicine and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Jo-Anne YoungDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Nahed El KassarNational Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Robert Q LeMedical Officer, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Kirk R SchultzProfessor of Pediatrics, UBC, Michael Cuccione Childhood Cancer Research Program, BC Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.
Linda M GriffithDivision of Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Bipin N SavaniLong Term Transplant Clinic, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
John R WingardUniversity of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, Florida; Bone Marrow Transplant Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune reconstitution after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) beyond 1 year is not completely understood. Many transplant recipients who are free of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and not receiving any immunosuppression more than 1 year after transplantation seem to be able to mount appropriate immune responses to common pathogens and respond adequately to immunizations. However, 2 large registry studies over the last 2 decades seem to indicate that infection is a significant cause of late mortality in some patients, even in the absence of concomitant GVHD. Research on this topic is particularly challenging for several reasons. First, there are not enough long-term follow-up clinics able to measure even basic immune parameters late after HCT. Second, the correlation between laboratory measurements of immune function and infections is not well known. Third, accurate documentation of infectious episodes is notoriously difficult. Finally, it is unclear what measures can be implemented to improve the immune response in a clinically relevant way. A combination of long-term multicenter prospective studies that collect detailed infectious data and store samples as well as a national or multinational registry of clinically significant infections (eg, vaccine-preventable severe infections, opportunistic infections) could begin to address our knowledge gaps. Obtaining samples for laboratory evaluation of the immune system should be both calendar and eventdriven. Attention to detail and standardization of practices regarding prophylaxis, diagnosis, and definitions of infections would be of paramount importance to obtain clean reliable data. Laboratory studies should specifically address the neogenesis, maturation, and exhaustion of the adaptive immune system and, in particular, how these are influenced by persistent alloreactivity, inflammation, and viral infection. Ideally, some of these long-term prospective studies would collect information on long-term changes in the gut microbiome and their influence on immunity. Regarding enhancement of immune function, prospective measurement of the response to vaccines late after HCT in a variety of clinical settings should be undertaken to better understand the benefits as well as the limitations of immunizations. The role of intravenous immunoglobulin is still not well defined, and studies to address it should be encouraged.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansImmune ReconstitutionInfectionsLong Term Adverse EffectsNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)United StatesImmune reconstitutionImmunizationIntravenous immunoglobulinLate infections

Identifiers

PMID27751936
PMCPMC5392182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.