ArticleCancer genetics2016
Mutant TP53 disrupts age-related accumulation patterns of somatic mutations in multiple cancer types.
Article in Cancer genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methylation array signals are predictive of chronological age without bisulfite conversion.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Relationship between tumor mutational burden, gene mutation status, and clinical characteristics in 340 cases of lung adenocarcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2022Article
- Deciphering the Increased Prevalence of TP53 Mutations in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.Cancer informatics · 2022Article
- Review
- Somatic Mutations in Renal Cyst Epithelium in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2018Article
- NSAID use and somatic exomic mutations in Barrett's esophagus.Genome medicine · 2018Article
- Significant Prognostic Features and Patterns of SomaticCancer informatics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Most cancers are driven by somatic mutations in proto-oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Genetic changes in a tumor may accumulate in the tissue self-renewal phase prior to neoplasm. The risk of sporadic mutations increases with age. In this regard, a positive association between patient age and the accumulated mutation burden in tumors exists for many cancer types. However, the reported lines of evidence for such a connection are still limited. TP53 is the most frequently mutated cancer gene. The encoded p53 protein plays crucial roles in DNA repair. Hereby, we speculate that mutant TP53 can disrupt the age-related accumulation patterns of somatic mutations in tumors. We performed linear model analysis on the clinically-annotated genomic data published by TCGA. We found that there was a significant interaction between TP53 genotype (mutant versus wild-type) and patient age at the initial clinical date on somatic mutation burden for five cancers. That is, the regression coefficients of mutation burden on patient age were significant (p < 0.05) for TP53 wild-type tumors but not the mutant counterparts. This disparity was further verified by comparing the group-specific regression coefficients. This finding confirmed our hypothesis and provided unique insights into p53-related tumorigenesis such as the potential temporal order of driver mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.