Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27751235›Full record

ArticleeLife2016

Control of the structural landscape and neuronal proteotoxicity of mutant Huntingtin by domains flanking the polyQ tract.

Koning Shen, Barbara Calamini, Jonathan A Fauerbach, Boxue Ma, Sarah H Shahmoradian, Ivana L Serrano Lachapel, Wah Chiu, Donald C Lo, Judith Frydman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Koning ShenDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2607-449X
Barbara CalaminiCenter for Drug Discovery, Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.
Jonathan A FauerbachDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Boxue MaVerna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States.
Sarah H ShahmoradianVerna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States.
Ivana L Serrano LachapelDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Wah ChiuVerna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States.
Donald C LoCenter for Drug Discovery, Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.
Judith FrydmanDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2302-6943
Baylor College of Medicine · USStanford University · USDuke University · USMiltenyi Biotec (Germany) · DE

Funding

Center for Protein Folding Machinery (RMI)PN2EY016525 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI CHIU, WAH · 2005 to 2015
$33.6M
3 D ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF MACROMOLECULES (5P41RR002250-27)P41GM103832 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHIU, WAH · 2012 to 2019
$15.1M
Project 3: TRiC modulation of CNS pathogenesis in HD mouse modelsP01NS092525 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI THOMPSON, LESLIE MICHELS · 2016 to 2020
$6.3M
PROTEIN FOLDING IN THE EUKARYOTIC CYTOSOLR01GM056433 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Judith Frydman · 1997 to 2026
$5.0M
Proteostasis in the aging brainR01AG056290 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BRUNET, ANNE, FRYDMAN, JUDITH · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
Automation of Assay Endpoints for Brain Slice Models of Neurodegenerative DiseaseR21NS080514 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LO, DONALD C · 2012 to 2013
$439k
NEI NIH HHS PN2 EY016525NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056290NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103832NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM056433NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS092525NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS080514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many neurodegenerative diseases are linked to amyloid aggregation. In Huntington's disease (HD), neurotoxicity correlates with an increased aggregation propensity of a polyglutamine (polyQ) expansion in exon 1 of mutant huntingtin protein (mHtt). Here we establish how the domains flanking the polyQ tract shape the mHtt conformational landscape in vitro and in neurons. In vitro, the flanking domains have opposing effects on the conformation and stabilities of oligomers and amyloid fibrils. The N-terminal N17 promotes amyloid fibril formation, while the C-terminal Proline Rich Domain destabilizes fibrils and enhances oligomer formation. However, in neurons both domains act synergistically to engage protective chaperone and degradation pathways promoting mHtt proteostasis. Surprisingly, when proteotoxicity was assessed in rat corticostriatal brain slices, either flanking region alone sufficed to generate a neurotoxic conformation, while the polyQ tract alone exhibited minimal toxicity. Linking mHtt structural properties to its neuronal proteostasis should inform new strategies for neuroprotection in polyQ-expansion diseases.

Indexed as

PeptidesAnimalsHuntingtin ProteinHuntington DiseaseMutant ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsNuclear ProteinsProtein ConformationProtein MultimerizationRatsHtt protein, ratHuntingtin ProteinMutant ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPeptidespolyglutamineaggregationbiochemistrycell biologyhumanHuntington's diseasemouseproteostasis

Identifiers

PMID27751235
PMCPMC5135392
OpenAlexW2532961478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.