Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27749991›Full record

SynthesisObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2016

Nutritional interventions or exposures in infants and children aged up to 3 years and their effects on subsequent risk of overweight, obesity and body fat: a systematic review of systematic reviews.

Bernadeta Patro-Gołąb, Bartłomiej M Zalewski, Maciej Kołodziej, Stefanie Kouwenhoven, Lucilla Poston, Keith M Godfrey, Berthold Koletzko, Johannes Bernard van Goudoever, Hania Szajewska

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 64 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Bernadeta Patro-Gołąb *Department of Paediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Bartłomiej M Zalewski *Department of Paediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Maciej KołodziejDepartment of Paediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Stefanie KouwenhovenVU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Department of Pediatrics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lucilla PostonKCL Division of Women's Health, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's College London and Kings Health Partners, UK.
Keith M GodfreyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit and NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Berthold KoletzkoLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Division of Metabolic and Nutritional Medicine, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, University of Munich Medical Centre, München, Germany.
Johannes Bernard van GoudoeverVU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Department of Pediatrics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hania SzajewskaDepartment of Paediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLKings Health Partners · GBLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/15/17/31749Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10452Medical Research Council MC_U147574222Medical Research Council MC_U147574226Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1017Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/4Medical Research Council MR/L002477/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study, performed as part of the international EarlyNutrition research project (http://www.project-earlynutrition.eu), provides a systematic review of systematic reviews on the effects of nutritional interventions or exposures in children (up to 3 years of age) on the subsequent risk of obesity, overweight and adiposity. Electronic databases (including MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library) were searched up until September 2015. Forty systematic reviews were included. A consistent association of breastfeeding with a modest reduction in the risk of later overweight and obesity in childhood and adulthood was found (the odds decreased by 13% based on high-quality studies), but residual confounding cannot be excluded. Lowering the protein content of infant formula is a promising intervention to reduce the risk of later overweight and obesity in children. There is no consistent evidence of an association of the age of introducing complementary foods, sugar-sweetened beverage or energy intake in early childhood with later overweight/obesity, but there are some indications of an association of protein intake during the complementary feeding period with later overweight/obesity. There was inadequate evidence to determine the effects of other nutritional interventions or exposures, including modifications of infant formula composition, fat intake or consumption of different food groups.

Indexed as

Child Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAdiposityChild, PreschoolDietHumansInfantMeta-Analysis as TopicNutrition PolicyObservational Studies as TopicOverweightPatient CompliancePediatric ObesityRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReview Literature as TopicRisk FactorsNutritionobesitysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID27749991
PMCPMC5325317
OpenAlexW2539274360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.