Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27749905›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Real-Time Tele-Mentored Low Cost "Point-of-Care US" in the Hands of Paediatricians in the Emergency Department: Diagnostic Accuracy Compared to Expert Radiologists.

Floriana Zennaro, Elena Neri, Federico Nappi, Daniele Grosso, Riccardo Triunfo, Francesco Cabras, Francesca Frexia, Stefania Norbedo, Pierpaolo Guastalla, Massino Gregori and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Floriana ZennaroInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via dell'istria 65/1, Trieste, Italy.
Elena NeriInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via dell'istria 65/1, Trieste, Italy.
Federico NappiUniversity of Trieste, Piazzale Europa 1, Trieste Italy.
Daniele GrossoInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via dell'istria 65/1, Trieste, Italy.
Riccardo TriunfoCRS4, Loc. Piscina Manna, Pula, Cagliari, Italy.
Francesco CabrasCRS4, Loc. Piscina Manna, Pula, Cagliari, Italy.
Francesca FrexiaCRS4, Loc. Piscina Manna, Pula, Cagliari, Italy.
Stefania NorbedoInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via dell'istria 65/1, Trieste, Italy.
Pierpaolo GuastallaInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via dell'istria 65/1, Trieste, Italy.
Massino GregoriInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via dell'istria 65/1, Trieste, Italy.
Elisabetta CattaruzziInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via dell'istria 65/1, Trieste, Italy.
Daniela SanaborInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via dell'istria 65/1, Trieste, Italy.
Egidio BarbiInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via dell'istria 65/1, Trieste, Italy.
Marzia LazzeriniInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via dell'istria 65/1, Trieste, Italy.
Center for Advanced Studies Research and Development in Sardinia · ITUniversity of Trieste · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of point-of-care ultrasonography (POC US) in paediatrics is increasing. This study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of POC US in children accessing the emergency department (ED) when performed by paediatricians under the remote guidance of radiologists (TELE POC).

methodsChildren aged 0 to 18 years accessing the ED of a third level research hospital with eight possible clinical scenarios and without emergency/severity signs at the triage underwent three subsequent US tests: by a paediatrician guided remotely by a radiologist (TELE POC); by the same radiologist (UNBLIND RAD); by an independent blinded radiologist (BLIND RAD). Tele-radiology was implemented using low cost "commercial off-the-shelf" (COTS) equipment and open-source software. Data were prospectively collected on predefined templates.

resultsFifty-two children were enrolled, for a total of 170 ultrasound findings. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of TELE POC were: 93.8, 99.7, 96.8, 99.4 when compared to UNBLIND RAD and 88.2, 99.7, 96.8, 98.7 when compared to BLIND RAD. The inter-observers agreement between the paediatricians and either the unblind or blind radiologist was excellent (k = 0.93). The mean duration of TELE POC was 6.3 minutes (95% CI 4.1 to 8.5). Technical difficulties occurred in two (3.8%) cases. Quality of the transmission was rated as fair, good, very good and excellent in 7.7%, 15.4%, 42.3% and 34.6% of cases respectively, while in no case was it rated as poor.

conclusionsPOC US performed by paediatricians in ED guided via tele-radiology by an expert radiologist (TELE POC) produced reliable and timely diagnoses. Findings of this study, especially for the rarer conditions under evaluation, need further confirmation. Future research should investigate the overall benefits and the cost savings of using tele-ultrasound to perform US "at children's bedsides", under remote guidance of expert radiologists.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care SystemsUltrasonographyAbdomenAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolComputer SystemsDiagnostic ErrorsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleProfessional PracticeRemote Consultation

Identifiers

PMID27749905
PMCPMC5066956
OpenAlexW2534985757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.