Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27749548›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2016

Persistence to antihypertensive drug classes: A cohort study using the Swedish Primary Care Cardiovascular Database (SPCCD).

Miriam Qvarnström, Thomas Kahan, Helle Kieler, Lena Brandt, Jan Hasselström, Kristina Bengtsson Boström, Karin Manhem, Per Hjerpe, Björn Wettermark

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Medical Measures in Hypertensives Considered Resistant.American journal of hypertension · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Beta blocker rebound phenomenon is important, but we do not know its definition, incidence or optimal prevention strategies.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2020
    Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Drug treatment of hypertension in Sweden in relation to sex, age, and comorbidity.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Miriam QvarnströmDepartment of Medicine, Center for Pharmacoepidemiology, Karolinska Institutet Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Center for Family and Community Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Närhälsan R&D Primary Care, R&D-Center Skaraborg, Skövde Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine/Cardiology, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg Department of Healthcare Development, Public Healthcare Services Committee, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.
Thomas Kahan
Helle Kieler
Lena Brandt
Jan Hasselström
Kristina Bengtsson Boström
Karin Manhem
Per Hjerpe
Björn Wettermark

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim was to study persistence to, and switching between, antihypertensive drug classes and to determine factors associated with poor persistence.This was an observational cohort study. The Swedish Primary Care Cardiovascular Database includes data from medical records, socioeconomic data, filled prescriptions, and hospitalizations from national registries for 75,000 patients with hypertension. Patients included in the study were initiated on antihypertensive drug treatment in primary healthcare in 2006 to 2007. We defined class persistence as the proportion remaining on the initial drug class, including 30 days of gap. Patients with a filled prescription of another antihypertensive drug class after discontinuation of the initial drug, including 30 days of gap, were classified as switchers. Persistence to the various drug classes were compared with that for diuretics.We identified 4997 patients (mean age 60 ± 12 years in men and 63 ± 13 years in women). Out of these, 95 (2%) filled their first prescription for fixed combination therapy and 4902 (98%) for monotherapy, including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (37%), angiotensin receptor blockers (4%), beta blockers (21%), calcium channel blockers (8%), and diuretics (28%). Persistence to the initial drug class was 57% after 1 year and 43% after 2 years. There were no differences in persistence between diuretics and any of the other antihypertensive drug classes, after adjustment for confounders. Discontinuation (all adjusted) was more common in men (P = 0.004), younger patients (P < 0.001), those with mild systolic blood pressure elevation (P < 0.001), and patients born outside the Nordic countries (P < 0.001). Among 1295 patients who switched drug class after their first prescription, only 21% had a blood pressure recorded before the switch occurred; and out them 69% still had high blood pressures.In conclusion, there appears to be no difference in drug class persistence between diuretics and other major antihypertensive drug classes, when factors known to be associated with poor persistence are taken into account.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDrug CombinationsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPolypharmacySex FactorsAntihypertensive AgentsDrug Combinations

Identifiers

PMID27749548
PMCPMC5059050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.