Observational studyDiseases of the colon and rectum2016
Greatest Challenges of Rectal Cancer Survivors: Results of a Population-Based Survey.
Observational study in Diseases of the colon and rectum, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-Analysis on the Application Value of Collaborative Nursing in Postcolostomy Nursing of Patients with Colorectal Cancer.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Microscopic intramural extension of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: A meta-analysis based on individual patient data.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Intimacy and survivors of cancer with ostomies: findings from the Ostomy Self-management Training trial.The journal of sexual medicine · 2023Trial
- Cancer survivors' greatest challenges of living with an ostomy: findings from the Ostomy Self-Management Telehealth (OSMT) randomized trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Trial
- The Greatest Challenges after Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty: A Qualitative Analysis.Transgender health · 2026Article
- Rectal Cancer Pain Score: A prospective cohort validation study across recovery stages.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025Article
- Gender-specific differences in factors influencing supportive care needs in colorectal cancer patients.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- The impact of Low-Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) on the Quality of Life in Rectal Cancer Survivors: a Narrative Review.Maedica · 2025Review
- The bowel function instrument for rectal cancer survivors with anastomosis and ostomy.Journal of psychosomatic research · 2024Article
- Long-Term Functional Outcome After Early vs. Late Stoma Closure in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Sub-analysis of the Multicenter FORCE Trial.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2024Article
- Deciphering the Dilemma: Choosing the Optimal Total Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- Review
- Article
- Article
- Multi-Disciplinary Management in Rectal Cancer Survivorship: A Clinical Practice Review.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2023Review
- Whether preferences of gastric cancer patients after surgery for follow-up change over time? Analysis based on discrete choice experiment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- Multilayer framework for digital multicomponent platform design for colorectal survivors and carers: a qualitative study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Micro video incentive nursing intervention improves the psychological state and quality of life in patients with rectal cancer after enterostomy.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
- Stakeholder engagement and participation in the design, delivery, and dissemination of the ostomy self-management telehealth (OSMT) program.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
- It's not fine: A photo-elicitation study of rectal cancer survivors' emotions and coping strategies.Surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEliciting the priorities of cancer survivors is essential to address the specific needs of cancer survivor subgroups.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to describe the greatest challenges related to treatment for long-term rectal cancer survivors.
designThis was an observational study with a cross-sectional survey. SETTINGS: The study included members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Northwest health plans. PATIENTS: A survey was mailed to long-term (≥5 years postdiagnosis) survivors of rectal cancer who had an anastomosis, temporary ostomy, or permanent ostomy.
main outcome measuresThe main outcome was measured with an open-ended question about the greatest challenge related to cancer surgery. We categorized responses using a grounded theory approach with double coding for reliability. Bonferroni-adjusted χ values were used to assess differences in the proportions of subgroups who mentioned challenges within each response category.
resultsThe survey completion rate was 61% (577/953); 76% (440/577) of participants responded to the greatest challenge question. The greatest challenges for respondents were bowel/ostomy management (reported by 44%), negative psychosocial effects (37%), late effects of treatment (21%), comorbidities and aging (13%), postoperative recovery (5%), and negative healthcare experiences (5%). Survivors with temporary ostomy or anastomosis were more likely than survivors with permanent ostomy to report late effects (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.01). Survivors with anastomosis were less likely than survivors with permanent ostomy to report negative psychosocial impacts (p = 0.0001). LIMITATIONS: Generalizability is restricted by the lack of ethnically and racially diverse, uninsured (non-Medicare-eligible population), and non-English-speaking participants. Because the survey was cross-sectional and included respondents at different times since diagnosis, we could not adequately address changes in the greatest challenges over time.
conclusionsOur results reveal the need for bowel/ostomy management, psychosocial services, and surveillance for late effects in survivorship and supportive care services for all survivors of rectal cancer, regardless of ostomy status. The perspective of long-term survivors with anastomosis reveals challenges that may not be anticipated during decision making for treatment (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/DCR/A254).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.