Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27749476›Full record

Observational studyDiseases of the colon and rectum2016

Greatest Challenges of Rectal Cancer Survivors: Results of a Population-Based Survey.

Carmit K McMullen, Joanna E Bulkley, Andrea Altschuler, Christopher S Wendel, Marcia Grant, Mark C Hornbrook, Virginia Sun, Robert S Krouse

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Diseases of the colon and rectum, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Microscopic intramural extension of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: A meta-analysis based on individual patient data.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Cancer survivors' greatest challenges of living with an ostomy: findings from the Ostomy Self-Management Telehealth (OSMT) randomized trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Rectal Cancer Pain Score: A prospective cohort validation study across recovery stages.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Whether preferences of gastric cancer patients after surgery for follow-up change over time? Analysis based on discrete choice experiment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Stakeholder engagement and participation in the design, delivery, and dissemination of the ostomy self-management telehealth (OSMT) program.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Carmit K McMullen1 Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon 2 Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Oakland, California 3 Southern Arizona Veterans Affairs Health Care System and University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona 4 Division of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, California.
Joanna E Bulkley
Andrea Altschuler
Christopher S Wendel
Marcia Grant
Mark C Hornbrook
Virginia Sun
Robert S Krouse
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USCity of Hope · USUniversity of Arizona · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

VITAMIN AP30CA023074 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Dan Theodorescu · 1985 to 2026
$110.2M
HR-QOL in Colorectal Cancer Survivors with StomasR01CA106912 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI HERRINTON, LISA J, KROUSE, ROBERT SCOTT · 2004 to 2013
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023074NCI NIH HHS R01 CA106912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEliciting the priorities of cancer survivors is essential to address the specific needs of cancer survivor subgroups.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to describe the greatest challenges related to treatment for long-term rectal cancer survivors.

designThis was an observational study with a cross-sectional survey. SETTINGS: The study included members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Northwest health plans. PATIENTS: A survey was mailed to long-term (≥5 years postdiagnosis) survivors of rectal cancer who had an anastomosis, temporary ostomy, or permanent ostomy.

main outcome measuresThe main outcome was measured with an open-ended question about the greatest challenge related to cancer surgery. We categorized responses using a grounded theory approach with double coding for reliability. Bonferroni-adjusted χ values were used to assess differences in the proportions of subgroups who mentioned challenges within each response category.

resultsThe survey completion rate was 61% (577/953); 76% (440/577) of participants responded to the greatest challenge question. The greatest challenges for respondents were bowel/ostomy management (reported by 44%), negative psychosocial effects (37%), late effects of treatment (21%), comorbidities and aging (13%), postoperative recovery (5%), and negative healthcare experiences (5%). Survivors with temporary ostomy or anastomosis were more likely than survivors with permanent ostomy to report late effects (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.01). Survivors with anastomosis were less likely than survivors with permanent ostomy to report negative psychosocial impacts (p = 0.0001). LIMITATIONS: Generalizability is restricted by the lack of ethnically and racially diverse, uninsured (non-Medicare-eligible population), and non-English-speaking participants. Because the survey was cross-sectional and included respondents at different times since diagnosis, we could not adequately address changes in the greatest challenges over time.

conclusionsOur results reveal the need for bowel/ostomy management, psychosocial services, and surveillance for late effects in survivorship and supportive care services for all survivors of rectal cancer, regardless of ostomy status. The perspective of long-term survivors with anastomosis reveals challenges that may not be anticipated during decision making for treatment (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/DCR/A254).

Indexed as

ColectomyLong Term Adverse EffectsOstomyQuality of LifeRectal NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient PreferenceSurvivorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID27749476
PMCPMC5226258
OpenAlexW2535536744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.