Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27748762›Full record

ArticleOncogene2017

Targeting the hedgehog transcription factors GLI1 and GLI2 restores sensitivity to vemurafenib-resistant human melanoma cells.

F Faião-Flores, D K Alves-Fernandes, P C Pennacchi, S Sandri, A L S A Vicente, C Scapulatempo-Neto, V L Vazquez, R M Reis, J Chauhan, C R Goding and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. [Molecular cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The Role of Hedgehog Signaling in the Melanoma Tumor Bone Microenvironment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

F Faião-FloresDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Toxicological Analysis, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
D K Alves-FernandesDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Toxicological Analysis, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
P C PennacchiDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Toxicological Analysis, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
S SandriDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Toxicological Analysis, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
A L S A VicenteMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.
C Scapulatempo-NetoMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.
V L VazquezMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.
R M ReisMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.
J ChauhanLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK.
C R GodingLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK.
K S SmalleyThe Department of Tumor Biology, The Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
S S Maria-EnglerDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Toxicological Analysis, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRHospital de Câncer de Barretos · BRLudwig Cancer Research · GBCentro de Computação Gráfica · PTMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Assessment CoreP01CA128814 · NCI · SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE · PI SMITH, JEFFREY W · 2009 to 2020
$19.1M
Tissue, Pathology and BioinformaticsP50CA168536 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI MULE, JAMES J. · 2013 to 2017
$8.5M
Microenvironment mediated drug resistance in melanoma.R01CA161107 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI SMALLEY, KEIRAN · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Modeling and Targeting Adaptive Signaling Responses in Single NRAS Mutant Melanoma CellsR21CA198550 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI SMALLEY, KEIRAN · 2015 to 2016
$422k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA128814NCI NIH HHS P50 CA168536NCI NIH HHS R01 CA161107NCI NIH HHS R21 CA198550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) therapy for melanoma patients harboring the V600E mutation is initially highly effective, but almost all patients relapse within a few months. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underpinning BRAFi-based therapy is therefore an important issue. Here we identified a previously unsuspected mechanism of BRAFi resistance driven by elevated Hedgehog (Hh) pathway activation that is observed in a cohort of melanoma patients after vemurafenib treatment. Specifically, we demonstrate that melanoma cell lines, with acquired in vitro-induced vemurafenib resistance, show increased levels of glioma-associated oncogene homolog 1 and 2 (GLI1/GLI2) compared with naïve cells. We also observed these findings in clinical melanoma specimens. Moreover, the increased expression of the transcription factors GLI1/GLI2 was independent of canonical Hh signaling and was instead correlated with the noncanonical Hh pathway, involving TGFβ/SMAD (transforming growth factor-β/Sma- and Mad-related family) signaling. Knockdown of GLI1 and GLI2 restored sensitivity to vemurafenib-resistant cells, an effect associated with both growth arrest and senescence. Treatment of vemurafenib-resistant cells with the GLI1/GLI2 inhibitor Gant61 led to decreased invasion of the melanoma cells in a three-dimensional skin reconstruct model and was associated with a decrease in metalloproteinase (MMP2/MMP9) expression and microphthalmia transcription factor upregulation. Gant61 monotherapy did not alter the drug sensitivity of naïve cells, but could reverse the resistance of melanoma cells chronically treated with vemurafenib. We further noted that alternating dosing schedules of Gant61 and vemurafenib prevented the onset of BRAFi resistance, suggesting that this could be a potential therapeutic strategy for the prevention of therapeutic escape. Our results suggest that targeting the Hh pathway in BRAFi-resistant melanoma may represent a viable therapeutic strategy to restore vemurafenib sensitivity, reducing or even inhibiting the acquired chemoresistance in melanoma patients.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCellular SenescenceGene ExpressionGene Knockdown TechniquesHedgehog ProteinsHumansIndolesKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsMelanomaProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSignal TransductionAntineoplastic AgentsHedgehog ProteinsIndolesKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSulfonamidesVemurafenibZinc Finger Protein GLI1Zinc Finger Protein Gli2

Identifiers

PMID27748762
PMCPMC5378933
OpenAlexW2535510152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.