Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27748162›Full record

ArticleThe journal of spinal cord medicine2018

Comparison of energy efficiency between Wearable Power-Assist Locomotor (WPAL) and two types of knee-ankle-foot orthoses with a medial single hip joint (MSH-KAFO).

Kanan Yatsuya, Satoshi Hirano, Eiichi Saitoh, Shigeo Tanabe, Hirotaka Tanaka, Masayuki Eguchi, Masaki Katoh, Yasuhiro Shimizu, Akito Uno, Hitoshi Kagaya

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kanan Yatsuyaa Department of Rehabilitation Medicine I, School of Medicine , Fujita Health University , Toyoake , Aichi , Japan.
Satoshi Hiranoa Department of Rehabilitation Medicine I, School of Medicine , Fujita Health University , Toyoake , Aichi , Japan.
Eiichi Saitoha Department of Rehabilitation Medicine I, School of Medicine , Fujita Health University , Toyoake , Aichi , Japan.
Shigeo Tanabec Faculty of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences , Fujita Health University , Toyoake , Aichi , Japan.
Hirotaka Tanakab Department of Rehabilitation , Japan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety Chubu Rosai Hospital , Nagoya , Aichi , Japan.
Masayuki Eguchib Department of Rehabilitation , Japan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety Chubu Rosai Hospital , Nagoya , Aichi , Japan.
Masaki Katohd Department of Rehabilitation , Fujita Health University Hospital , Toyoake , Aichi , Japan.
Yasuhiro Shimizue Rehabilitation Center , Kizankai Memorial Hospital , Iida , Nagano , Japan.
Akito Unof Orthopedic Services Division , Tomei Brace Co., Ltd. , Seto , Aichi , Japan.
Hitoshi Kagayaa Department of Rehabilitation Medicine I, School of Medicine , Fujita Health University , Toyoake , Aichi , Japan.
Fujita Health University · JPChubu Rosai Hospital · JPFujita Health University Hospital · JPJapan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety · JPTomey (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the energy efficiency of Wearable Power-Assist Locomotor (WPAL) with conventional knee-ankle-foot orthoses (MSH-KAFO) such as Hip and Ankle Linked Orthosis (HALO) or Primewalk. STUDY

designCross over case-series.

settingChubu Rosai Hospital, Aichi, Japan, which is affiliated with the Japan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety.

methodsSix patients were trained with MSH-KAFO (either HALO or Primewalk) and WPAL. They underwent 6-minute walk tests with each orthosis. Energy efficiency was estimated using physiological cost index (PCI) as well as heart rate (HR) and modified Borg score. Trial energy efficiency with MSH-KAFO was compared with WPAL to assess if differences in PCI became greater between MSH-KAFO and WPAL as time goes on during the 6-minute walk. Spearman correlation coefficient of time (range: 0.5-6.0 minutes) with the difference was calculated. The same statistical procedures were repeated for HR and modified Borg score.

resultsGreater energy efficiency, representing a lower gait demand, was observed in trials with WPAL compared with MSH-KAFO (Spearman correlation coefficients for PCI, HR and modified Borg were 0.93, 0.90 and 0.97, respectively, all P < 0.0001).

conclusionsWPAL is a practical and energy efficient type of robotics that may be used by patients with paraplegia.

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismGaitAdultExoskeleton DeviceFemaleHeart RateHip JointHumansLower ExtremityMaleNeurological RehabilitationOrthotic DevicesSpinal Cord InjuriesEnergy efficiencyOrthosisPhysiological cost indexRehabilitationSpinal cord injuryWearable power-assist locomotor

Identifiers

PMID27748162
PMCPMC5810806
OpenAlexW2533004775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.