Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27748157›Full record

ArticleGlobal public health2018

Surveillance or support: The experience of direct observation during tuberculosis treatment.

Ietza Bojorquez, Irais Salazar, Richard S Garfein, Paris Cerecer, Timothy C Rodwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Perceptions and experiences of directly observed treatment in tuberculosis: insights from a mixed-methods cross-sectional study.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. "Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ietza Bojorqueza Department of Population Studies , El Colegio de la Frontera Norte , Tijuana , Mexico.
Irais Salazarb Academic direction, El Colegio de la Frontera Norte , Tijuana , Mexico.
Richard S Garfeinc Division of Global Public Health , University of California , San Diego , CA , USA.
Paris Cerecere Secretaría de Salud de Baja California , Tijuana , Mexico.
Timothy C Rodwellf Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine , University of California , San Diego , CA , USA.
El Colegio de la Frontera Norte · MXSecretaria de Salud · MXUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of California System · US

Funding

Rapid Tests for Drug Resistance to Detect Extensively Drug-Resistant TuberculosisU01AI082229 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CATANZARO, ANTONINO · 2009 to 2013
$10.9M
Mobile Phone-Based Video Directly Observed Therapy for TuberculosisR21AI088326 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GARFEIN, RICHARD S · 2010 to 2011
$415k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI088326NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI082229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Directly observed therapy (DOT) is a cornerstone of tuberculosis (TB) control. DOT has been criticised as paternalistic, but it has also been argued that the interaction with healthcare workers (HWs) can be a source of support for patients. We explored the experience of patients in antituberculosis treatment, with the aim of understanding the balance between surveillance and support from the recipient's point of view. We interviewed 27 patients in Tijuana, Mexico, employing narrative analysis to understand how participants made sense of their illness and their experience of DOT. We found a core narrative of biographic disruption and self-reconstruction, in which HWs helped participants to attribute a less negative meaning to TB. Interviewees accepted DOT's as necessary for other people to avoid treatment abandonment, but felt that in their case it was unnecessary. Only a few felt that DOT represented mistrust on the part of the HWs. We conclude that DOT can be a source of support when it is enacted in a patient-centred way. We discuss whether participants' lack of criticism of DOT is a case of adaptive preference, in the context of a power differential between patient and health system.

Indexed as

Directly Observed TherapyAdultAgedAntitubercular AgentsFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMexicoMiddle AgedPersonal AutonomyProfessional-Patient RelationsProfessional RoleQualitative ResearchSocial SupportAntitubercular AgentsDirectly observed therapyhealth servicespersonal autonomysocial supporttuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID27748157
PMCPMC5392434
OpenAlexW2532321187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.