Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27748061›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2016

Enhanced detection of lymphovascular invasion in small rectal neuroendocrine tumors using D2-40 and Elastica van Gieson immunohistochemical analysis.

Yoshiyasu Kitagawa, Dai Ikebe, Taro Hara, Kazuki Kato, Teisuke Komatsu, Fukuo Kondo, Ryousaku Azemoto, Fumitake Komoda, Taketsugu Tanaka, Hirofumi Saito and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Lymph node metastasis in a patient with carcinomaMolecular and clinical oncology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshiyasu KitagawaEndoscopy Division, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.
Dai IkebeDivision of Surgical Pathology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.
Taro HaraEndoscopy Division, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.
Kazuki KatoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Funabashi Central Hospital, Funabashi, Japan.
Teisuke KomatsuPathology Division, Funabashi Central Hospital, Funabashi, Japan.
Fukuo KondoPathology Division, School of Medicine, Teikyo University, Itabashi, Japan.
Ryousaku AzemotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kimitsu Chuo Hospital, Kimitsu, Japan.
Fumitake KomodaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Chiba Rosai Hospital, Ichihara, Japan.
Taketsugu TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Chiba Rosai Hospital, Ichihara, Japan.
Hirofumi SaitoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Chiba Kaihin Municipal Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Makiko ItamiDivision of Surgical Pathology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.
Taketo YamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.
Takuto SuzukiEndoscopy Division, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.
Chiba Cancer Center · JPChiba Rosai Hospital · JPFunabashi Central Hospital · JPAccretech (Japan) · JPChiba Kaihin Municipal Hospital · JPTeikyo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rectal neuroendocrine tumor (RNET) lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is regarded as an important predictor of nodal metastasis after endoscopic resection (ER). However, little is known about the frequency of immunohistochemical detection of LVI in RNETs. This study was performed to establish the actual detection of LVI rate in RNETs ≤10 mm and to evaluate associated clinical outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed the records for 98 consecutive patients treated by ER with a total of 102 RNETs ≤10 mm. Tissue sections were labeled with hematoxylin-eosin (HE) stain, the D2-40 monoclonal antibody to evaluate lymphatic invasion, and Elastica van Gieson (EVG) stain to detect venous invasion. LVI detection rate by HE versus immunohistochemical analysis was compared. Follow-up findings and clinical outcomes were also evaluated for 91 patients who were followed for ≥12 months. Lymphatic and venous invasion were detected using HE staining alone in 6.9% and 3.9% of patients, respectively, whereas they were detected using D2-40 and EVG staining in 20.6% and 47.1% of the patients, respectively. Thus, the LVI detection frequency using D2-40 and EVG staining (56.9%) was significantly higher than with HE (8.8%). Two out of seven patients who required additional surgery had regional lymph node metastases. However, among the 84 patients who were followed up without surgery, no distant metastases or recurrences were detected. Compared with HE staining, immunohistochemical analysis significantly increased the frequency of LVI detection in RNETs ≤10 mm. However, the clinical impact of LVIs detected using immunohistochemical analysis remains unclear. Clarification of the actual role of LVI using immunohistochemical analysis requires a patient long-term follow-up and outcomes.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorImmunohistochemistryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm InvasivenessNeuroendocrine TumorsPrognosisAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedBiomarkers, Tumormonoclonal antibody D2-40D2-40Elastica van Giesonlymphovascular invasionrectal neuroendocrine tumors

Identifiers

PMID27748061
PMCPMC5119967
OpenAlexW2536474942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.