ArticleJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior2016
Behavioral pharmacology of the odor span task: Effects of flunitrazepam, ketamine, methamphetamine and methylphenidate.
Article in Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- This or not that: select and reject control of relational responding in rats using a blank comparison procedure with odor stimuli.Animal cognition · 2024Article
- Generalized, cross-modal, and incrementing non-matching-to-sample in rats.Learning & behavior · 2023Article
- Olfactory Dysfunction in Schizophrenia: Evaluating Olfactory Abilities Across Species.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2023Review
- Behavioral Tasks Evaluating Schizophrenia-like Symptoms in Animal Models: A Recent Update.Current neuropharmacology · 2021Review
- Odor span task in dogs (Canis familiaris).Animal cognition · 2020Article
- Effects of NMDA antagonist dizocilpine (MK-801) are modulated by the number of distractor stimuli in the rodent odor span task of working memory.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2019Article
- Effects of N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists ketamine, methoxetamine, and phencyclidine on the odor span test of working memory in rats.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2018Article
- Amnestic drugs in the odor span task: Effects of flunitrazepam, zolpidem and scopolamine.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2017Article
- Validation of the human odor span task: effects of nicotine.Psychopharmacology · 2017Article
- Evidence for novelty reward cross-cueing in the odor span task in rats: implications for odor-based reward-motivated tasks.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Odor Span Task is an incrementing non-matching-to-sample procedure that permits the study of behavior under the control of multiple stimuli. Rats are exposed to a series of odor stimuli and selection of new stimuli is reinforced. Successful performance thus requires remembering which stimuli have previously been presented during a given session. This procedure has been frequently used in neurobiological studies as a rodent model of working memory; however, only a few studies have examined the effects of drugs on performance in this task. The present experiments explored the behavioral pharmacology of a modified version of the Odor Span Task by determining the effects of stimulant drugs methylphenidate and methamphetamine, NMDA antagonist ketamine, and positive GABA
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.