Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27747837›Full record

ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2016

First-Line Treatment with Bevacizumab and Platinum Doublet Combination in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study in US Oncology Community Practices.

Orsolya E Lunacsek, Arliene Ravelo, Anna D Coutinho, Sebastien J Hazard, Mark R Green, Joanne Willey, Michael Eaddy, Hans-Peter Goertz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Phase I Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ramucirumab in Combination with Osimertinib in Advanced T790M-positiveClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Orsolya E LunacsekXcenda LLC, 4114 Woodlands Parkway, Suite 500, Palm Harbor, FL, USA. orsolya.lunacsek@xcenda.com.
Arliene RaveloGenentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Anna D CoutinhoXcenda LLC, 4114 Woodlands Parkway, Suite 500, Palm Harbor, FL, USA.
Sebastien J HazardGenentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Mark R GreenXcenda LLC, 4114 Woodlands Parkway, Suite 500, Palm Harbor, FL, USA.
Joanne WilleyXcenda LLC, 4114 Woodlands Parkway, Suite 500, Palm Harbor, FL, USA.
Michael EaddyXcenda LLC, 4114 Woodlands Parkway, Suite 500, Palm Harbor, FL, USA.
Hans-Peter GoertzGenentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Ascendis Pharma (Denmark) · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReal-world evidence is lacking on the impact of bevacizumab added to carboplatin/paclitaxel (Bev + CP) therapy versus CP alone for patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC), particularly in those excluded from clinical trials.

methodsThis is a retrospective electronic medical record analysis of patients who received first-line therapy with Bev + CP or CP between 1 October 2006 and 30 June 2013. We identified four subsets: elderly patients (≥65 years), patients with brain/central nervous system (CNS) metastases, patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥2, and patients receiving anticoagulation. We used descriptive statistics to describe patient characteristics and treatment patterns and evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using survival analyses.

resultsThe study included 431 patients (Bev + CP: 231; CP: 200). The Bev + CP cohort was more likely to receive four or more cycles of induction therapy (72 vs. 50 %) and was more likely to receive maintenance therapy (45 vs. 21 %) than patients receiving CP. In the overall population, median PFS and OS were significantly longer in the Bev + CP cohort than in the CP cohort: 6.7 vs. 5.1 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.92; p = 0.008) and 11.9 vs. 9.0 months (HR 0.57; 95 % CI 0.44-0.73; p < 0.001), respectively. Treatment with Bev + CP in patients aged ≥65 years and in those with brain/CNS metastases was also associated with a significant risk reduction in PFS (35 and 51 %, respectively; p < 0.05 for both) and OS (46 and 62 %, respectively; p < 0.05 for both) compared with CP alone.

conclusionBev + CP is associated with a significant improvement in PFS and OS in patients with NS-NSCLC and in subsets with brain/CNS metastases and those aged ≥65 years.

Identifiers

PMID27747837
PMCPMC5042946
OpenAlexW2511999371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.