Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27747828›Full record

ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2016

Differences in Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonist Use in Rural and Urban Older Adults.

Meghan K Mattos, Susan M Sereika, Jennifer G Naples, Steven M Albert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Trends and variation in benzodiazepine use in nursing homes in the USA.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Responsiveness of Veterans Affairs Health Care System to Zolpidem Safety Warnings.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meghan K MattosDepartment of Health and Community Systems, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, 415 Victoria Building, 3500 Victoria Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA. mkm65@pitt.edu.
Susan M SereikaDepartment of Health and Community Systems, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, 415 Victoria Building, 3500 Victoria Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
Jennifer G NaplesDivision of Geriatric Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Kaufmann Building, Suite 500, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Steven M AlbertBehavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, 208 Parran Hall, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.

Funding

VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JENNIFER S BRACH · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
Pitt Integrated Clinical and Geroscience Research Training ProgramT32AG021885 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Aditi U Gurkar · 2003 to 2026
$6.7M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001918NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827NIA NIH HHS T32 AG021885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults are especially susceptible to adverse consequences of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), such as benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZDRAs), due to age-related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes. Although some risk factors for BZDRA use in older adults have been identified, the role of rural versus urban residence is less clear.

objectiveTo describe BZDRA use in rural versus urban older adults using pharmaceutical claims from Pennsylvania's Pharmaceutical Assistance Contract for the Elderly (PACE) program.

methodsThe sample consisted of older adults enrolled in Pennsylvania's Healthy Steps for Older Adults and participated in Pennsylvania's PACE program. Independent sample t tests and contingency tables were used to examine residence differences. Multivariate binary logistic modeling was performed.

resultsThe total sample (N = 426) was 305 (71.6 %) urban-dwelling adults and 121 (28.4 %) rural-dwelling adults. Rural participants were more likely to be male, white, married, and have less than a high school education compared with urban participants (p <.01). Specifically, 25 % of rural-dwelling adults received a BZDRA compared with 15 % of urban-dwelling adults (p = 0.02). Three variables reached statistical significance for predicting BZDRA use in a multivariate model: rural residence (OR 2.58, 95 % CI 1.39-4.79), history of anxiety/depression (OR 4.20, 95 % CI 2.39-7.46), and number of medications (OR 1.11, 95 % CI 1.02-1.21).

conclusionsBZDRA prescription differences in older, rural-dwelling adults further highlights the need for geriatric and mental health specialists to provide specialized care to this population. Rural healthcare professionals may be less aware of PIMs for older adults, and initiatives to support geriatric services and provide education for existing providers may be beneficial.

Identifiers

PMID27747828
PMCPMC5042936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.