ArticleRheumatology and therapy2016
Disease Control, Health Resource Use, Healthcare Costs, and Predictors in Gout Patients in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, and France: A Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Predictors of poor response to urate-lowering therapy in patients with gout and hyperuricemia: a post-hoc analysis of a multicenter randomized trial.Clinical rheumatology · 2019Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe present study aimed to assess disease control, health resource utilization (HRU), and healthcare costs, and their predictors in gout patients across the USA, UK, Germany, and France.
methodsData were extracted from the PharMetrics Plus (USA), Clinical Practice Research Datalink-Hospital Episode Statistics (UK), and Disease Analyzer databases (Germany and France) for adult gout patients over a 3-year period: 2009-2011 (all dates +1 year for France). Patients had "prevalent established gout" (i.e., were treated with urate-lowering therapy [ULT] or eligible for ULT based on American College of Rheumatology guidelines) in the preindex panel-year, with January 1 of the second study year as the study index date. Assessments of disease control (uncontrolled gout definition: ≥1 serum urate (sUA) elevation or ≥2 flares; analysis limited to the subpopulation with sUA) data, HRU, and costs were in the second post-index panel-year, while potential predictors (demographics and gout treatment characteristics) were identified in the first post-index panel-year.
resultsTreatment rates were high (>70% with chronic urate-lowering treatment in all countries but France), while between 31.3% (France) and 62.9% (USA) of patients remained uncontrolled. Predictors of control included female gender and high adherence. In Germany, the UK, and France, lack of disease control predicted increased gout-attributed costs and increased HRU, both gout-attributed (also in the USA) and non-gout-attributed.
conclusionGout management remains suboptimal, as many patients remain uncontrolled despite using urate-lowering treatment. Effective and convenient treatment options are needed to improve disease control and minimize additional HRU and costs.
fundingAstraZeneca.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.