ArticleJACC. Basic to translational science2016
Detection and Management of Geographic Disparities in the TOPCAT Trial: Lessons Learned and Derivative Recommendations.
Article in JACC. Basic to translational science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Beta-blockers and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system for chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Highlights in heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2019Pooled it
- Beta-blockers and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system for chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Globalization of heart failure clinical trials: a systematic review of 305 trials conducted over 16 years.European journal of heart failure · 2018Pooled it
- Impact of frailty on outcomes in atrial fibrillation and HFpEF: data from the TOPCAT trial.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Trial
- Variation in clinical and patient-reported outcomes among complex heart failure with preserved ejection fraction phenotypes.ESC heart failure · 2020Trial
- On the search for the right definition of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Cardiology journal · 2020Trial
- Association of β-Blocker Use With Heart Failure Hospitalizations and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality Among Patients With Heart Failure With a Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Secondary Analysis of the TOPCAT Trial.JAMA network open · 2019Trial
- Sex Differences in Outcomes and Responses to Spironolactone in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Secondary Analysis of TOPCAT Trial.JACC. Heart failure · 2019Trial
- Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in HFpEF: Distinguishing Drug-Specific Response from Prognostic Phenotypes Across Randomized Trials.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Evolving Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism: a Narrative Review on Differences between Steroidal MRAs, Non-Steroidal MRAs and Aldosterone Synthase Inhibitors in Cardiorenal Disease.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Regional differences in outcomes with ablation versus drug therapy for atrial fibrillation: Results from the CABANA trial.American heart journal · 2024Article
- Aldosterone Effect on Cardiac Structure and Function.Current cardiology reviews · 2024Review
- Worsening Renal Function and Adverse Outcomes in Patients with HFpEF with or without Atrial Fibrillation.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular adverse events in oncology trials: understanding and appreciating the differences between clinical trial data and real-world reports.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2022Review
- Molecular Mechanism of Induction of Bone Growth by the C-Type Natriuretic Peptide.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Challenges and Lessons Learned From COVID-19 Trials: Should We Be Doing Clinical Trials Differently?The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2021Review
- Cellular and molecular pathobiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2021Review
- Drug development in oncology and devices-lessons for heart failure drug development and approval? a review.Heart failure reviews · 2021Review
- Sex Differences in Characteristics and Outcomes in Elderly Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction: AFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
TOPCAT was a multinational clinical trial of 3,445 heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients that enrolled in 233 sites in six countries in North America, Eastern Europe and South America. Patients with a heart failure hospitalization in the last 12 months or an elevated B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) were randomized to the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist spironolactone vs. placebo. Sites in Russia and the Republic of Georgia provided the majority of early enrollment, primarily based on the hospitalization criterion since BNP levels were initially unavailable there. With the emergence of country-specific aggregate event rate data indicating lower rates in Eastern Europe and differences in patient characteristics there, the DSMB recommended relatively increasing enrollment in North America plus other corrective measures. Although final enrollment reflected the increased contribution from North America, a plurality of the final cohort came from Russia and Georgia (49% vs. 43% in North America). BNP measurements from Russia and Georgia available later in the trial suggested no or a mild level of heart failure consistent with low event rates. The primary results showed no significant spironolactone treatment effect overall (primary endpoint hazard ratio 0.89 (0.77, 1.04)), with a significant hazard ratio in North and South America (0.82 (0.69, 0.98), p =0.026) but not in Russia and Georgia (1.10 (0.79, 1.51), interaction p = 0.12). This report describes the DSMB's detection and management recommendations for regional differences in patient characteristics in TOPCAT, and suggests methods of surveillance and corrective actions that may be useful for future trials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.