Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27747213›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2016

Dereplication of Natural Products Using GC-TOF Mass Spectrometry: Improved Metabolite Identification by Spectral Deconvolution Ratio Analysis.

Fausto Carnevale Neto, Alan C Pilon, Denise M Selegato, Rafael T Freire, Haiwei Gu, Daniel Raftery, Norberto P Lopes, Ian Castro-Gamboa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Ecological Insights to Track Cytotoxic Compounds amongMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fausto Carnevale NetoNúcleo de Pesquisas em Produtos Naturais e Sintéticos, Departamento de Física e Química, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São PauloRibeirão Preto, Brazil; Núcleo de Bioensaios, Biossíntese e Ecofisiologia de Produtos Naturais, Departamento de Química Orgânica, Instituto de Química, Universidade Estadual Paulista UNESPAraraquara, Brazil.
Alan C PilonNúcleo de Bioensaios, Biossíntese e Ecofisiologia de Produtos Naturais, Departamento de Química Orgânica, Instituto de Química, Universidade Estadual Paulista UNESP Araraquara, Brazil.
Denise M SelegatoNúcleo de Bioensaios, Biossíntese e Ecofisiologia de Produtos Naturais, Departamento de Química Orgânica, Instituto de Química, Universidade Estadual Paulista UNESP Araraquara, Brazil.
Rafael T FreireNúcleo de Bioensaios, Biossíntese e Ecofisiologia de Produtos Naturais, Departamento de Química Orgânica, Instituto de Química, Universidade Estadual Paulista UNESPAraraquara, Brazil; Centro de Imagens e Espectroscopia in vivo por Ressonância Magnética, Instituto de Física de São Carlos, Universidade de São PauloSão Carlos, Brazil.
Haiwei GuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Northwest Metabolomics Research Center, University of WashingtonSeattle, WA, USA; Jiangxi Key Laboratory for Mass Spectrometry and Instrumentation, East China Institute of TechnologyNanchang, China.
Daniel RafteryDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Northwest Metabolomics Research Center, University of WashingtonSeattle, WA, USA; Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattle, WA, USA.
Norberto P LopesNúcleo de Pesquisas em Produtos Naturais e Sintéticos, Departamento de Física e Química, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Ian Castro-GamboaNúcleo de Bioensaios, Biossíntese e Ecofisiologia de Produtos Naturais, Departamento de Química Orgânica, Instituto de Química, Universidade Estadual Paulista UNESP Araraquara, Brazil.

Funding

Advanced Methods in NMR-Based MetabolomicsR01GM085291 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAFTERY, DANIEL · 2008 to 2016
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dereplication based on hyphenated techniques has been extensively applied in plant metabolomics, thereby avoiding re-isolation of known natural products. However, due to the complex nature of biological samples and their large concentration range, dereplication requires the use of chemometric tools to comprehensively extract information from the acquired data. In this work we developed a reliable GC-MS-based method for the identification of non-targeted plant metabolites by combining the Ratio Analysis of Mass Spectrometry deconvolution tool (RAMSY) with Automated Mass Spectral Deconvolution and Identification System software (AMDIS). Plants species from Solanaceae, Chrysobalanaceae and Euphorbiaceae were selected as model systems due to their molecular diversity, ethnopharmacological potential, and economical value. The samples were analyzed by GC-MS after methoximation and silylation reactions. Dereplication was initiated with the use of a factorial design of experiments to determine the best AMDIS configuration for each sample, considering linear retention indices and mass spectral data. A heuristic factor (CDF, compound detection factor) was developed and applied to the AMDIS results in order to decrease the false-positive rates. Despite the enhancement in deconvolution and peak identification, the empirical AMDIS method was not able to fully deconvolute all GC-peaks, leading to low

Indexed as

compound identificationGC-MSpeak deconvolutionplant metabolomicsratio analysis

Identifiers

PMID27747213
PMCPMC5044510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.