ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016
Comparative Genomic Analysis among Four Representative Isolates of
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative genomics of Eastern-IndianFrontiers in fungal biology · 2026Article
- Molecular mechanisms ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Comparative Genomics and Gene Pool Analysis Reveal the Decrease of Genome Diversity and Gene Number in Rice Blast Fungi by Stable Adaption with Rice.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Comparative Genomic Analysis Reveals Genetic Variation and Adaptive Evolution in the Pathogenicity-Related Genes ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Whole Genome Re-sequencing Reveals Natural Variation and Adaptive Evolution ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Genome-wide identification of long non-coding RNAs suggests a potential association with effector gene transcription in Phytophthora sojae.Molecular plant pathology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comparative genomic analysis is useful for identifying genes affected by evolutionary selection and for studying adaptive variation in gene functions. In
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.