Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27746737›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2016

Δ9-THC Intoxication by Cannabidiol-Enriched Cannabis Extract in Two Children with Refractory Epilepsy: Full Remission after Switching to Purified Cannabidiol.

José A S Crippa, Ana C S Crippa, Jaime E C Hallak, Rocio Martín-Santos, Antonio W Zuardi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Cannabidiol at the crossroads: panacea, placebo, or problem?Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  5. Research and Clinical Practice Involving the Use ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Neuropharmacological Effects of the Main Phytocannabinoids: A Narrative Review.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Oral Cannabidiol Does Not Convert to ΔCannabis and cannabinoid research · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

José A S CrippaDepartment of Neuroscience and Behavior, University of São Paulo Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Ana C S CrippaDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Federal University of Paraná Curitiba, Brazil.
Jaime E C HallakDepartment of Neuroscience and Behavior, University of São Paulo Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Rocio Martín-SantosDepartment of Neuroscience and Behavior, University of São PauloRibeirão Preto, Brazil; Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinic, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute - Center for Biomedical Research in Mental Health Network and Department of Medicine - University of BarcelonaBarcelona, Spain.
Antonio W ZuardiDepartment of Neuroscience and Behavior, University of São Paulo Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BRUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal studies and preliminary clinical trials have shown that cannabidiol (CBD)-enriched extracts may have beneficial effects for children with treatment-resistant epilepsy. However, these compounds are not yet registered as medicines by regulatory agencies. We describe the cases of two children with treatment-resistant epilepsy (Case A with left frontal dysplasia and Case B with Dravet Syndrome) with initial symptom improvement after the introduction of CBD extracts followed by seizure worsening after a short time. The children presented typical signs of intoxication by Δ9-THC (inappropriate laughter, ataxia, reduced attention, and eye redness) after using a CBD-enriched extract. The extract was replaced by the same dose of purified CBD with no Δ9-THC in both cases, which led to improvement in intoxication signs and seizure remission. These cases support pre-clinical and preliminary clinical evidence suggesting that CBD may be effective for some patients with epilepsy. Moreover, the cases highlight the need for randomized clinical trials using high-quality and reliable substances to ascertain the safety and efficacy of cannabinoids as medicines.

Indexed as

cannabidiolCbdelectrophysiologicalepilepsyintoxicationrefractory reriod

Identifiers

PMID27746737
PMCPMC5043219
OpenAlexW2525028860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.