ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2017
Combined robotic transanal total mesorectal excision (R-taTME) and single-site plus one-port (R-SSPO) technique for ultra-low rectal surgery-initial experience with a new operation approach.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03422835 (A Prospective Cohort Study of Robotic Transanal Total Mesentery Excision Versus Conventional Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer in Low Site), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Cohort Study of Robotic Transanal Total Mesentery Excision Versus Conventional Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer in Low Site
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resection for the treatment of stage II and III sigmoid colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for left-sided colon cancer: a multicentre study with propensity score matching analysis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2023Article
- Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for left-sided colon cancer: a multicentre study with propensity score matching analysis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2023Article
- Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: What We Learned in the Last Two Decades and the Future Perspectives.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2023Review
- Robotic Surgery in Rectal Cancer: Potential, Challenges, and Opportunities.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022Review
- Single plus one-port robotic surgery using the da Vinci Single-Site Platform versus conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2022Article
- Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision: Is the future now?World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021Review
- Robotic Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (RTaTME): State of the Art.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- Robotic-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: technique and results from a single institution.Techniques in coloproctology · 2021Article
- SP rTaTME: initial clinical experience with single-port robotic transanal total mesorectal excision (SP rTaTME).Techniques in coloproctology · 2021Article
- Clinical Status and Future Prospects of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Robotics Total Mesorectal Excision Up To the Minute.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2020Review
- Comparison of the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery, open surgery, and transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: An overview of systematic reviews.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2020Review
- Robotic surgery for colorectal disease: review of current port placement and future perspectives.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2020Article
- Feasibility of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) using the Medrobotics Flex® System.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Enabling single-site laparoscopy: the SPORT platform.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Article
- Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME): current status and future perspectives.Updates in surgery · 2019Review
- Robotic-assisted stereotactic real-time navigation: initial clinical experience and feasibility for rectal cancer surgery.Techniques in coloproctology · 2019Article
- Robot-guided neuromapping during nerve-sparing taTME for low rectal cancer.International journal of colorectal disease · 2018Article
- Review and update: robotic transanal surgery (RTAS).Updates in surgery · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveRobot-assisted rectal surgery is gaining popularity, and robotic single-site surgery is also being explored clinically. We report our initial experience with robotic transanal total mesorectal excision (R-taTME) and radical proctectomy using the robotic single-site plus one-port (R-SSPO) technique for low rectal surgery.
methodsBetween July 2015 and March 2016, 15 consecutive patients with ultra-low rectal lesions underwent R-taTME followed by radical proctectomy using the R-SSPO technique by a single surgeon. The clinical and pathological results were retrospectively analyzed.
resultsThe median operative time was 473 (range, 335-569) min, and the estimated blood loss was 33 (range, 30-50) mL. The median number of lymph nodes harvested was 12 (range, 8-18). The median distal resection margin was 1.4 (range, 0.4-3.5) cm, and all patients had clear circumferential resection margins. We encountered a left ureteric transection intraoperatively in one patient, and another patient required reoperation for postoperative adhesive intestinal obstruction. There was no 30-day mortality.
conclusionR-taTME followed by radical proctectomy using the R-SSPO technique for patients with low rectal lesions is technically feasible and safe without compromising oncologic outcomes. However, there were considerable limitations and a steep learning curve using current robotic technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.