Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27744353›Full record

ReviewEvolution, medicine, and public health2016

Evolutionary Science as a Method to Facilitate Higher Level Thinking and Reasoning in Medical Training.

Joseph L Graves, Chris Reiber, Anna Thanukos, Magdalena Hurtado, Terry Wolpaw

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evolution, medicine, and public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. TheEvolution, medicine, and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The state of evolutionary medicine in undergraduate education.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Core principles of evolutionary medicine: A Delphi study.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joseph L GravesJoint School for Nanoscience & Nanoengineering, North Carolina A&T State University & UNC Greensboro, 2907 E. Gate City Blvd, Greensboro, NC gravesjl@ncat.edu.
Chris ReiberDepartment of Anthropology, Binghamton University, PO Box 6000, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000.
Anna ThanukosUniversity of California Museum of Paleontology, 1101 Valley Sciences Building, Berkeley, CA 94720-4780.
Magdalena HurtadoDepartment of Anthropology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281.
Terry WolpawPenn State Health, Pennsylvania State University, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary science is indispensable for understanding biological processes. Effective medical treatment must be anchored in sound biology. However, currently the insights available from evolutionary science are not adequately incorporated in either pre-medical or medical school curricula. To illuminate how evolution may be helpful in these areas, examples in which the insights of evolutionary science are already improving medical treatment and ways in which evolutionary reasoning can be practiced in the context of medicine are provided. In order to facilitate the learning of evolutionary principles, concepts derived from evolutionary science that medical students and professionals should understand are outlined. These concepts are designed to be authoritative and at the same time easily accessible for anyone with the general biological knowledge of a first-year medical student. Thus we conclude that medical practice informed by evolutionary principles will be more effective and lead to better patient outcomes.Furthermore, it is argued that evolutionary medicine complements general medical training because it provides an additional means by which medical students can practice the critical thinking skills that will be important in their future practice. We argue that core concepts from evolutionary science have the potential to improve critical thinking and facilitate more effective learning in medical training.

Identifiers

PMID27744353
PMCPMC5101907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.