Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27744301›Full record

ArticleAge and ageing2017

Influences on diet quality in older age: the importance of social factors.

Ilse Bloom, Mark Edwards, Karen A Jameson, Holly E Syddall, Elaine Dennison, Catharine R Gale, Janis Baird, Cyrus Cooper, Avan Aihie Sayer, Sian Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age and ageing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ilse BloomMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Mark EdwardsMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit,University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Karen A JamesonMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit,University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Holly E SyddallMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit,University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Elaine DennisonMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit,University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Catharine R GaleMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Janis BairdMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit,University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Cyrus CooperMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Avan Aihie SayerMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Sian RobinsonMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit,University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0400491Medical Research Council MC_U147574212Medical Research Council MC_U147574218Medical Research Council MC_U147574234Medical Research Council MC_U147574237Medical Research Council MC_U147585819Medical Research Council MC_U147585824Medical Research Council MC_U147585827Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1015Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/2Medical Research Council MR/K026992/1Versus Arthritis 19583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: poor diet quality is common among older people, but little is known about influences on food choice, including the role of psychosocial factors at this age. Objective: to identify psychosocial correlates of diet quality in a community-dwelling population of men and women aged 59-73 years; to describe relationships with change in diet quality over 10 years. Design: Longitudinal cohort, Hertfordshire Cohort Study (HCS). Subjects: HCS participants assessed at baseline (1998-2003: 1,048 men, 862 women); 183 men and 189 women re-assessed in 2011. Methods: diet was assessed by administered food frequency questionnaire; diet scores were calculated to describe diet quality at baseline and follow-up. A range of psychosocial factors (social support, social network, participation in leisure activities, depression and anxiety, sense of control) were assessed by questionnaire. Results: at baseline, better diet quality was related to a range of social factors, including increased confiding/emotional social support (men and women), practical support (men) and a larger social network (women) (all P < 0.05). For both men and women, greater participation in social and cognitive leisure activities was related to better diet quality (P < 0.005). There were few associations between measured psychosocial factors at baseline and change in diet score over 10 years, in the follow-up sub-group. However, greater participation in leisure activities, especially cognitive activities, at baseline was associated with smaller declines in diet quality over the 10-year follow-up period for both men (P = 0.017) and women (P = 0.014). Conclusions: in community-dwelling older adults, a range of social factors, that includes greater participation in leisure activities, were associated with diets of better quality.

Indexed as

AgingChoice BehaviorDietFood PreferencesNutritional StatusSocial BehaviorAgedAge FactorsCognitionEmotionsEnglandFemaleHabitsHumansLeisure ActivitiesLongitudinal Studiesageingdietolder peoplesocial relationshipsUK

Identifiers

PMID27744301
PMCPMC5390861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.