ReviewDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2016
The application of neuroimaging to social inequity and language disparity: A cautionary examination.
Review in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biological aging in childhood and adolescence following experiences of threat and deprivation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Psychological bulletin · 2020Pooled it
- Measuring early experiences: Challenges and future directions.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2025Review
- Why and how to collect representative study samples in educational neuroscience research.Trends in neuroscience and education · 2024Review
- The Necessity of Taking Culture and Context into Account When Studying the Relationship between Socioeconomic Status and Brain Development.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- The promise and pitfalls of a strength-based approach to child poverty and neurocognitive development: Implications for policy.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2024Article
- Childhood socioeconomic status and the pace of structural neurodevelopment: accelerated, delayed, or simply different?Trends in cognitive sciences · 2023Review
- Increasing diversity in developmental cognitive neuroscience: A roadmap for increasing representation in pediatric neuroimaging research.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2022Review
- Brain network coupling associated with cognitive performance varies as a function of a child's environment in the ABCD study.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Flux of life.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2019Review
- A person-centered approach to the assessment of early life stress: Associations with the volume of stress-sensitive brain regions in early adolescence.Development and psychopathology · 2019Article
- Socioeconomic disparities in academic achievement: A multi-modal investigation of neural mechanisms in children and adolescents.NeuroImage · 2018Article
- Time-varying effects of income on hippocampal volume trajectories in adolescent girls.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In the nascent field of the cognitive neuroscience of socioeconomic status (SES), researchers are using neuroimaging to examine how growing up in poverty affects children's neurocognitive development, particularly their language abilities. In this review we highlight difficulties inherent in the frequent use of reverse inference to interpret SES-related abnormalities in brain regions that support language. While there is growing evidence suggesting that SES moderates children's developing brain structure and function, no studies to date have elucidated explicitly how these neural findings are related to variations in children's language abilities, or precisely what it is about SES that underlies or contributes to these differences. This issue is complicated by the fact that SES is confounded with such linguistic factors as cultural language use, first language, and bilingualism. Thus, SES-associated differences in brain regions that support language may not necessarily indicate differences in neurocognitive abilities. In this review we consider the multidimensionality of SES, discuss studies that have found SES-related differences in structure and function in brain regions that support language, and suggest future directions for studies in the area of cognitive neuroscience of SES that are less reliant on reverse inference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.