Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27743738›Full record

Trial reportGynecologic oncology2016

Impact of histology and surgical approach on survival among women with early-stage, high-grade uterine cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary analysis.

Amanda N Fader, James Java, Meaghan Tenney, Stephanie Ricci, Camille C Gunderson, Sarah M Temkin, Nick Spirtos, Christina L Kushnir, Michael L Pearl, Oliver Zivanovic and 8 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gynecologic oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of a High-grade Endometrial Cancer Cohort Treated at Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Brazil.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023
    Review
  14. Carcinosarcoma of uterus.Radiology case reports · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Controversy on Positive Peritoneal Cytology of Endometrial Carcinoma.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Amanda N FaderKelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: afader1@jhmi.edu.
James JavaNRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Statisticsl & Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, United States. Electronic address: james.j.java@gmail.com.
Meaghan TenneyDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States. Electronic address: mtenney@babies.bsd.uchicago.edu.
Stephanie RicciKelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: RICCIS@ccf.org.
Camille C GundersonDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, United States. Electronic address: camille-gunderson@ouhsc.edu.
Sarah M TemkinKelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: stemkin1@jhmi.edu.
Nick SpirtosWomen's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, United States. Electronic address: nspirtos@wccenter.com.
Christina L KushnirKelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: christinalkush@gmail.com.
Michael L PearlDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States. Electronic address: michael.pearl@sbumed.org.
Oliver ZivanovicDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, United States. Electronic address: zivanovo@mskcc.org.
Krishnansu S TewariDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Medical Center at Irvine; Orange, CA, United States. Electronic address: ktewari@uci.edu.
David O'MalleyDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohio State Comprehensive Cancer Center; Columbus, OH, United States. Electronic address: omalley.46@osu.edu.
Ellen M HartenbachDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin Hospital - Madison; Madison, WI, United States. Electronic address: emharten@wisc.edu.
Chad A HamiltonDivision of Gynecologic Oncology; Walter Reed National Military Medical Center; Bethesda, MD, United States. Electronic address: chad.a.hamilton.mil@health.mil.
Natalie S GouldWomen's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, United States. Electronic address: ngould@wccenter.com.
Robert S MannelDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, United States. Electronic address: Robert-Mannel@ouhsc.edu.
William RodgersDepartment of Pathology; New York Hospital Queens; Flushing, NY, United States. Electronic address: whr9001@nyp.org.
Joan L WalkerDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, United States. Electronic address: joan-walker@ouhsc.edu.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI James J. Dignam · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
NRG Oncology NCORP Research Base-BIQSFPUG1CA189867 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Deborah Watkins Bruner, Lisa A. Kachnic · 2014 to 2026
$140.5M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP HEADQUARTERSU10CA027469 · NCI · GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP · PI DISAIA, PHILIP J. · 1985 to 2013
$132.6M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP STATISTICAL OFFICEU10CA037517 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI BLESSING, JOHN A · 1985 to 2013
$67.4M
Lead Academic Participating Site for the Development and Conduct of NCTN TrialsU10CA180798 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI MANNEL, ROBERT S., MOORE, KATHLEEN N. · 2014 to 2018
$6.7M
Network Lead Academic Participating Site: Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterU10CA180791 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI AGHAJANIAN, CAROL, MORRIS, MICHAEL J · 2014 to 2018
$4.6M
NCTN LAPS at Johns HopkinsUG1CA233196 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DEBORAH K ARMSTRONG, Julie Renee Brahmer · 2019 to 2026
$4.6M
Johns Hopkins University NCTN Lead Academic Site ProgramU10CA180802 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ARMSTRONG, DEBORAH K, BRAHMER, JULIE RENEE · 2014 to 2018
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS U10 CA027469NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037517NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180791NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180798NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180802NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189867NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe sought to analyze the clinicopathologic features, recurrence patterns and survival outcomes of women with high-grade uterine cancer (UC) enrolled on The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) LAP2 trial.

methodsThis is a post-hoc analysis of LAP-2 patients with grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma (ENDO), uterine serous (USC), clear cell (CC) and carcinosarcoma (CS). Demographics, clinicopathologic features, and recurrence patterns, were compared by histology and surgical approach. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsOf the 2600 patients enrolled in LAP-2, 753 patients had high-grade UC: 350 had ENDO, 289 had USC, 42 had CC and 72 had CS. Compared with the ENDO cohort, those with other high-grade subtypes were older (p<0.001) and were more likely to have positive peritoneal cytology (p<0.001), positive lymph nodes (p=0.05) and higher disease stage on final pathology (p<0.001). With a median follow-up time of 60months, compared to patients with ENDO, those with USC, CCC and CS subtypes had higher recurrence rates (p<0.001), extra-pelvic recurrences (p<0.001) and poorer PFS (p<0.001) and OS (p<0.001). Those diagnosed with USC and CS experienced the worst survival outcomes (p=0.003). Patterns of recurrence and survival were not different in those staged with LSC vs LAP. On multivariable analysis, age, stage, pelvic washings and Type II histology were independently and adversely associated with survival.

conclusionsWomen with apparent early-stage, USC and CS histologies have poorer outcomes than women with grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Patterns of recurrence and survival were not impacted by surgical approach.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, Clear CellAgedCarcinoma, EndometrioidCarcinosarcomaDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansHysterectomyKaplan-Meier EstimateLaparoscopyLaparotomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and SerousNeoplasm StagingSurvival RateHigh-grade uterine cancerLAP-2 trialMinimally invasive surgeryType II uterine cancerUterine cancer

Identifiers

PMID27743738
PMCPMC5116702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.