ArticleCritical care (London, England)2016
Consensus development of core competencies in intensive and critical care medicine training in China.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does training improve diagnostic accuracy and inter-rater agreement in applying the Berlin radiographic definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome? A multicenter prospective study.Critical care (London, England) · 2017Trial
- Article
- Application of the Cognitive Apprenticeship Teaching Model in the Standardized Training of Critical Care Medicine Resident Physicians: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
- Competency-based education in intensive care multiprofessional training: a scoping review.Critical care science · 2025Article
- Critical care echocardiography: barriers, competencies and solutions. A survey of over 600 participants.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2023Article
- Core competencies in critical care for general medical practitioners in South Africa: A Delphi study.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2023Article
- A novel multimodal needs assessment to inform the longitudinal education program for an international interprofessional critical care team.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- A Two-Stage Bedside Intubation Method to Improve Success Rate of Post-pyloric Placement of Spiral Nasoenteric Tubes in Critically Ill Patients: A Multi-Center, Prospective Study.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Nursing research priorities in critical care in Brazil: Delphi Study.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2020Article
- The learning curve in blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tubes: data from a multicentre, prospective observational study.The Journal of international medical research · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study is to develop consensus on core competencies required for postgraduate training in intensive care medicine.
methodsWe used a combination of a modified Delphi method and a nominal group technique to create and modify the list of core competencies to ensure maximum consensus. Ideas were generated modified from Competency Based Training in Intensive Care Medicine in Europe collaboration (CoBaTrICE) core competencies. An online survey invited healthcare professionals, educators, and trainees to rate and comment on these competencies. The output from the online survey was edited and then reviewed by a nominal group of 13 intensive care professionals to identify each competence for importance. The resulting list was then recirculated in the nominal group for iterative rating.
resultsThe online survey yielded a list of 199 competencies for nominal group reviewing. After five rounds of rating, 129 competencies entered the final set defined as core competencies.
conclusionsWe have generated a set of core competencies using a consensus technique which can serve as an indicator for training program development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.