Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27743353›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2016

Compatibility of Biosimilar Filgrastim with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy during the Treatment of Malignant Diseases (VENICE): A Prospective, Multicenter, Non-Interventional, Longitudinal Study.

Stefan Fruehauf, Burkhard Otremba, Oliver Stötzer, Christine Rudolph

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01627990 (The Compatibility of Nivestim™ Under Cytotoxic Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Malignant Diseases), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01627990 completednot on this map

The Compatibility of Nivestim™ Under Cytotoxic Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Malignant Diseases

TypeobservationalSponsorHospira, now a wholly owned subsidiary of PfizerRan2011 to 2013Enrolled386ConditionsSolid Tumour, Malignant Haematological Tumour, Primary or Secondary Prophylactic Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Extrapolation in Practice: Lessons from 10 Years with Biosimilar Filgrastim.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stefan FruehaufKlinik Dr. Hancken, Hämatologie, Onkologie und Palliativmedizin, Stade, Germany. stefan_fruehauf@urz.uni-heidelberg.de.
Burkhard OtrembaOnkologische Praxis Oldenburg/Delmenhorst, Standort Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Oliver StötzerHämato-Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Praxis München, Munich, Germany.
Christine RudolphHospira Deutschland GmbH, A Pfizer Company, Medical Affairs, Munich, Germany.
Elbe Kliniken Stade-Buxtehude · DEPfizer (Germany) · DEPraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFebrile neutropenia (FN) is a serious and frequent complication of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim™, Hospira Inc, A Pfizer Company, Lake Forest, IL, USA) is a granulocyte-colony stimulating factor licensed for the treatment of neutropenia and FN induced by myelosuppressive chemotherapy. The primary goal of this VENICE study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01627990) was to observe the tolerability, safety and efficacy of biosimilar filgrastim in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy.

methodsThis was a prospective, multicenter, non-interventional, longitudinal study. Consenting adult patients with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies for whom cytotoxic chemotherapy and treatment with biosimilar filgrastim was planned were enrolled.

resultsAmong the enrolled patients (N = 386), 81% were female, with a median age (range) of 61 (22-92) years, with 39% >65 years old. Most patients (n = 338; 88%) had solid tumors and the remainder (n = 49; 13%) had hematological malignancies. The majority of the patients (64%) received biosimilar filgrastim as primary prophylaxis and 36% as secondary prophylaxis. At the follow-up visits, for the majority of patients (95.6%) there had been no change in chemotherapy dose due to FN. For two patients (0.5%) the chemotherapy was discontinued due to FN and for four patients (1.0%) the chemotherapy dose was reduced due to FN. For the majority of patients (96.9%) the chemotherapy cycle following the first biosimilar filgrastim treatment was not delayed due to FN. For 3 patients (0.8%), the chemotherapy was delayed following the first biosimilar filgrastim treatment. Less than one-third (29.8%) of the patients experienced ≥1 adverse event that was at least potentially related to biosimilar filgrastim treatment.

conclusionsBiosimilar filgrastim was effective and well-tolerated in both the primary and secondary prophylactic setting in patients undergoing chemotherapy for solid tumors and hematological malignancies.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01627990.

fundingHospira Inc, A Pfizer Company, Lake Forest, IL, USA.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsFebrile NeutropeniaFilgrastimAgedCytotoxinsFemaleHematologic AgentsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisProspective StudiesSecondary PreventionAntineoplastic AgentsBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsCytotoxinsFilgrastimHematologic AgentsBiosimilarChemotherapyFilgrastimGranulocyte-colony stimulating factorHematologyNeutropeniaNivestimOncology

Identifiers

PMID27743353
PMCPMC5083766
OpenAlexW2531703050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.