Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27743308›Full record

ArticleInfection2017

Assessing factors for loss to follow-up of HIV infected patients in Guinea-Bissau.

Pernille Bejer Nordentoft, Thomas Engell-Sørensen, Sanne Jespersen, Faustino Gomes Correia, Candida Medina, David da Silva Té, Lars Østergaard, Alex Lund Laursen, Christian Wejse, Bo Langhoff Hønge and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mobility and HIV care engagement: a research agenda.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pernille Bejer NordentoftBandim Health Project, INDEPTH Network, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.
Thomas Engell-SørensenBandim Health Project, INDEPTH Network, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.
Sanne JespersenBandim Health Project, INDEPTH Network, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.
Faustino Gomes CorreiaNational HIV Programme, Ministry of Health, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.
Candida MedinaNational HIV Programme, Ministry of Health, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.
David da Silva TéNational HIV Programme, Ministry of Health, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.
Lars ØstergaardDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Alex Lund LaursenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Christian WejseBandim Health Project, INDEPTH Network, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau. wejse@dadlnet.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2534-2942
Bo Langhoff HøngeBandim Health Project, INDEPTH Network, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.
Bissau HIV Cohort study group
Bandim Health Project · GWAarhus University Hospital · DKNational Institute of Public Health · GW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of this study was to ascertain vital status of patients considered lost to follow-up at an HIV clinic in Guinea-Bissau, and describe reasons for loss to follow-up (LTFU).

methodsThis study was a cross-sectional sample of a prospective cohort, carried out between May 15, 2013, and January 31, 2014. Patients lost to follow-up, who lived within the area of the Bandim Health Project, a demographic surveillance site (DSS), were eligible for inclusion. Active follow-up was attempted by telephone and tracing by a field assistant. Semi-structured interviews were done face to face or by phone by a field assistant and patients were asked why they had not shown up for the scheduled appointment. Patients were included by date of HIV testing and risk factors for LTFU were assessed using Cox proportional hazard model.

resultsAmong 561 patients (69.5 % HIV-1, 18.0 % HIV-2 and 12.6 % HIV-1/2) living within the DSS, 292 patients had been lost to follow-up and were, therefore, eligible for active follow-up. Vital status was ascertained in 65.9 % of eligible patients and 42.7 % were alive, while 23.2 % had died. Information on reasons for LTFU existed for 103 patients. Major reasons were moving (29.1 %), travelling (17.5 %), and transferring to other clinics (11.7 %).

conclusionA large proportion of the patients at the clinic were lost to follow-up. The main reason for this was found to be the geographic mobility of the population in Guinea-Bissau.

Indexed as

Lost to Follow-UpAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGuinea-BissauHIV InfectionsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsGuinea-BissauHIVLoss to follow-upMortalityRetentionWest Africa

Identifiers

PMID27743308
OpenAlexW2530226112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.