ArticleJournal of applied genetics2017
Similarities and differences in the nuclear genome organization within Pooideae species revealed by comparative genomic in situ hybridization (GISH).
Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Karyotype Analysis, Genomic and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (GISH and FISH) Reveal the Ploidy and Parental Origin of Chromosomes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Genomic constitution, allopolyploidy, and evolutionary proposal for Cynodon Rich. based on GISH.Protoplasma · 2022Article
- Novel Brassica hybrids with different resistance toOpen life sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- Molecular Cytogenetics in the Era of Chromosomics and Cytogenomic Approaches.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- GISH-based comparative genomic analysis in Urochloa P. Beauv.Molecular biology reports · 2020Article
- Article
- Deciphering the Evolutionary History of Arowana Fishes (Teleostei, Osteoglossiformes, Osteoglossidae): Insight from Comparative Cytogenomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Emerging patterns of genome organization in Notopteridae species (Teleostei, Osteoglossiformes) as revealed by Zoo-FISH and Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH).Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Cytological markers used for identification and transfer ofComparative cytogenetics · 2019Review
- Karyotype reshufflings of Festuca pratensis × Lolium perenne hybrids.Protoplasma · 2018Article
- Sex Chromosome Evolution and Genomic Divergence in the FishFrontiers in genetics · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, we highlight the affinity between the genomes of key representatives of the Pooideae subfamily, revealed at the chromosomal level by genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). The analyses were conducted using labeled probes from each species to hybridize with chromosomes of every species used in this study based on a "round robin" rule. As a result, the whole chromosomes or chromosome regions were distinguished or variable types of signals were visualized to prove the different levels of the relationships between genomes used in this study. We observed the unexpected lack of signals in secondary constrictions of rye (RR) chromosomes probed by triticale (AABBRR) genomic DNA. We have also identified unlabeled chromosome regions, which point to species-specific sequences connected with disparate pathways of chromosome differentiation. Our results revealed a conservative character of coding sequence of 35S rDNA among selected species of the genera Aegilops, Brachypodium, Festuca, Hordeum, Lolium, Secale, and Triticum. In summary, we showed strong relationships in genomic DNA sequences between species which have been previously reported to be phylogenetically distant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.