Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27743202›Full record

ReviewCurrent infectious disease reports2016

Updates in the Management of Cephalosporin-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.

Andre Arizpe, Kelly R Reveles, Shrina D Patel, Samuel L Aitken

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current infectious disease reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Emergence ofInfection and drug resistance · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andre ArizpeCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Kelly R RevelesCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Shrina D PatelDivision of Pharmacy, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 0090, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Samuel L AitkenDivision of Pharmacy, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 0090, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. slaitken@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USAustin College · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

San Antonio OAIC - Research Education Component (REC)P30AG044271 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Adam Salmon, Elena Volpi · 2015 to 2026
$14.1M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG044271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resistance to cephalosporins is now common among Gram-negative bacterial infections, including those caused by the Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, posing a major threat to public health. As resistance to the traditional drugs of choice for these infections, carbapenems, has also become increasingly common, interest in cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam as carbapenem-sparing alternatives has increased. Additionally, the availability of the novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam has added to the antimicrobial armamentarium available to treat these multidrug-resistant infections. Here, we review the recent literature on the use of carbapenem-sparing alternatives and highlight the potential utility of novel antimicrobials.

Indexed as

CarbapenemCefepimeCeftazidime-avibactamCeftolozane-tazobactamExtended-spectrum β-lactamasePiperacillin-tazobactamPseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID27743202
PMCPMC11801173
OpenAlexW2529948766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.