Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27743174›Full record

ReviewPituitary2017

Epidemiology of acromegaly: review of population studies.

Aikaterini Lavrentaki, Alessandro Paluzzi, John A H Wass, Niki Karavitaki

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pituitary, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 141 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 337 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Uterine fibroids in women diagnosed with acromegaly: a systematic review.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Mapping of the acromegaly quality of life questionnaire to ED-5D-5L index score among patients with acromegaly.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2021
    Trial
  8. Growth hormone-releasing hormone, growth hormone, and neuroendocrine tumors.Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Changing understanding of acromegaly epidemiology and early mortality risk.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  14. Acromegaly diagnosis.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Aikaterini LavrentakiEndocrine Unit, ARETAIEION Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Alessandro PaluzziDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
John A H WassOxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Niki KaravitakiInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, IBR Tower, Level 2, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. n.karavitaki@bham.ac.uk.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GROxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acromegaly is a rare condition necessitating large population studies for the generation of reliable epidemiological data. In this review, we systematically analysed the epidemiological profile of this condition based on recently published population studies from various geographical areas. The total prevalence ranges between 2.8 and 13.7 cases per 100,000 people and the annual incidence rates range between 0.2 and 1.1 cases/100,000 people. The median age at diagnosis is in the fifth decade of life with a median diagnostic delay of 4.5-5 years. Acral enlargement and coarse facial features are the most commonly described clinical manifestations. At the time of detection, most of the tumors are macroadenomas possibly relating to diagnostic delays and posing challenges in the surgical management. Increased awareness of acromegaly amongst the medical community is of major importance aiming to reduce the adverse sequelae of late diagnosis and treatment, improve patient outcomes and, hopefully, reduce the burden on the health care system.

Indexed as

AcromegalyAge DistributionFemaleHumansIncidenceMalePrevalenceSex DistributionAcromegalyEpidemiologyIncidencePrevalence

Identifiers

PMID27743174
PMCPMC5334410
OpenAlexW2530847956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.