Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27743169›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2017

Serum Cyr61 as a potential biomarker for diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Y F Song, Z B Xu, X J Zhu, X Tao, J L Liu, F L Gao, C L Wu, B Song, Q Lin

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Analysis of blood markers for early colorectal cancer diagnosis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Y F SongClinical Laboratory, People's Hospital Affiliated to Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 602 Bayiqi Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Z B XuMedical Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
X J ZhuMedical Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
X TaoPublic Health Medicine, People's Hospital Affiliated to Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 602 Bayiqi Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
J L LiuClinical Laboratory, People's Hospital Affiliated to Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 602 Bayiqi Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
F L GaoClinical Laboratory, People's Hospital Affiliated to Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 602 Bayiqi Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
C L WuMedical Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
B SongRespiratory Medicine, The Affiliated Mindong Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 89 Heshan Road, Fuan, 355000, China. mdyysongbin@163.com.
Q LinClinical Laboratory, People's Hospital Affiliated to Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 602 Bayiqi Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China. fjlinqing@126.com.
Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNFujian Medical University · CNUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the sensitivity and specificity of serum Cyr61 as a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and to assess the association between serum Cyr61 level and CRC clinicopathological status.

methodsWe used an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure serum Cyr61 in patients with CRC, patients with colorectal adenomas, and healthy controls. We also analyzed the relationship between serum Cyr61 and clinicopathological features of CRC patients. The levels of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) were quantified using the Roche Cobas 6000 Analyzer. The sensitivity and specificity of Cyr61, CEA, CA19-9 and CEA + CA19-9 were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

resultsThe serum level of Cyr61 was significantly increased in CRC patients compared with colorectal adenoma patients and healthy controls (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the area under the ROC curve for Cyr61 was 0.935 (95 % confidence interval 0.902-0.968), higher than that for CEA + CA19-9 (0.827, 95 % confidence interval: 0.783-0.871). Use of a Cyr61 cutoff value of 92.0 pg/mL allowed distinguishing CRC patients and healthy controls with a sensitivity of 83 % and a specificity of 97 %. Among CRC patients, an elevated level of serum Cyr61 was significantly associated with more advanced TNM stage (p < 0.0042), lymph node metastasis (p < 0.0088), and vascular invasion (p = 0.0027).

conclusionCyr61 has potential as a serum biomarker for the diagnosis of CRC and for assessment of the clinicopathological status of CRC.

Indexed as

AdenomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenCase-Control StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsCysteine-Rich Protein 61Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenCCN1 protein, humanCysteine-Rich Protein 61BiomarkerColorectal cancerCyr61Serum

Identifiers

PMID27743169
OpenAlexW2531252908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.