Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27743142›Full record

ArticleEmergency radiology2017

The RADCAT-3 system for closing the loop on important non-urgent radiology findings: a multidisciplinary system-wide approach.

Elizabeth H Dibble, David W Swenson, Cynthia Cobb, Timothy J Paul, Andrew E Karn, David C Portelli, Jonathan S Movson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth H DibbleDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University/Rhode Island Hospital, 3rd Floor Main Building, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA. edibble@lifespan.org.
David W SwensonDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University/Rhode Island Hospital, 3rd Floor Main Building, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
Cynthia CobbDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University/Rhode Island Hospital, 3rd Floor Main Building, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
Timothy J PaulInformation Services, Lifespan Corporation, Providence, RI, USA.
Andrew E KarnInformation Services, Lifespan Corporation, Providence, RI, USA.
David C PortelliDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University/Rhode Island Hospital and The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Jonathan S MovsonDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University/Rhode Island Hospital, 3rd Floor Main Building, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
Brown University · USLifespan · USProvidence College · USRhode Island Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this project was to create a system that was easy for radiologists to use and that could reliably identify, communicate, and track communication of important but non-urgent radiology findings to providers and patients. Prior to 2012, our workflow for communicating important non-urgent diagnostic imaging results was cumbersome, rarely used by our radiologists, and resulted in delays in report turnaround time. In 2012, we developed a new system to communicate important non-urgent findings (the RADiology CATegorization 3 (RADCAT-3) system) that was easy for radiologists to use and documented communication of results in the electronic medical record. To evaluate the performance of the new system, we reviewed our radiology reports before (June 2011-June 2012) and after (June 2012-June 2014) the implementation of the new system to compare utilization by the radiologists and success in communicating these findings. During the 12 months prior to implementation, 250 radiology reports (0.06 % of all reports) entered our workflow for communicating important non-urgent findings. One-hundred percent were successfully communicated. During the 24 months after implementation, 13,158 radiology reports (1.4 % of all reports) entered our new RADCAT-3 workflow (3995 (0.8 % of all reports) during year 1 and 9163 (1.9 % of all reports) during year 2). 99.7 % of those reports were successfully communicated. We created a reliable system to ensure communication of important but non-urgent findings with providers and/or patients and to document that communication in the electronic medical record. The rapid adoption of the new system by radiologists suggests that they found it easy to use and had confidence in its integrity. This system has the potential to improve patient care by improving the likelihood of appropriate follow-up for important non-urgent findings that could become life threatening.

Indexed as

WorkflowElectronic Health RecordsHospital Communication SystemsHumansRadiology Information SystemsTime FactorsFollow-up imagingIncidental findingsInformation technology solutionsPractice management

Identifiers

PMID27743142
OpenAlexW2531339185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.