Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27742639›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2016

Concentration-Dependent Synergy and Antagonism of Linezolid and Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Childhood Tuberculosis: The Dynamic Duo.

Devyani Deshpande, Shashikant Srivastava, Eric Nuermberger, Jotam G Pasipanodya, Soumya Swaminathan, Tawanda Gumbo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Artificial intelligence-derived 3-Way Concentration-dependent Antagonism of Gatifloxacin, Pyrazinamide, and Rifampicin During Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Examining effective monotherapy hypothesis for TB therapy failure and resistance emergence.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Mycobacterium tuberculosis sterilizing activity of faropenem, pyrazinamide and linezolid combination and failure to shorten the therapy duration.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Multidrug-resistant strains ofVeterinary world · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Gatifloxacin Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics-based Optimal Dosing for Pulmonary and Meningeal Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  19. Multiparameter Responses to Tedizolid Monotherapy and Moxifloxacin Combination Therapy Models of Children With Intracellular Tuberculosis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Devyani DeshpandeCenter for Infectious Diseases Research and Experimental Therapeutics, Baylor Research Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Shashikant SrivastavaCenter for Infectious Diseases Research and Experimental Therapeutics, Baylor Research Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Eric NuermbergerCenter for Tuberculosis Research, Department of Medicine Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jotam G PasipanodyaCenter for Infectious Diseases Research and Experimental Therapeutics, Baylor Research Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Soumya SwaminathanTuberculosis Research Center, Chennai, India.
Tawanda GumboCenter for Infectious Diseases Research and Experimental Therapeutics, Baylor Research Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Observatory, South Africa.
Baylor University Medical Center · USJohns Hopkins University · USNational Institute of Research in Tuberculosis · IN

Funding

Short course therapy for MDR-TB based on PK/PD answers for biological variabilityR56AI111985 · NIAID · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GUMBO, TAWANDA · 2014 to 2014
$900k
NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI111985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo treatment regimens have been specifically designed for children, in whom tuberculosis is predominantly intracellular. Given their activity as monotherapy and their ability to penetrate many diseased anatomic sites that characterize disseminated tuberculosis, linezolid and moxifloxacin could be combined to form a regimen for this need.

methodsWe examined microbial kill of intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) by the combination of linezolid and moxifloxacin multiple exposures in a 7-by-7 mathematical matrix. We then used the hollow fiber system (HFS) model of intracellular tuberculosis to identify optimal dose schedules and exposures of moxifloxacin and linezolid in combination. We mimicked pediatric half-lives and concentrations achieved by each drug. We sampled the peripheral compartment on days 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28 for Mtb quantification, and compared the slope of microbial kill of Mtb by these regimens to the standard regimen of isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide, based on exponential decline regression.

resultsThe full exposure-response surface identified linezolid-moxifloxacin zones of synergy, antagonism, and additivity. A regimen based on each of these zones was then used in the HFS model, with observed half-lives of 4.08 ± 0.66 for linezolid and 3.80 ± 1.34 hours for moxifloxacin. The kill rate constant was 0.060 ± 0.012 per day with the moxifloxacin-linezolid regimen in the additivity zone vs 0.083 ± 0.011 per day with standard therapy, translating to a bacterial burden half-life of 11.52 days vs 8.53 days, respectively.

conclusionsWe identified doses and dose schedules of a linezolid and moxifloxacin backbone regimen that could be highly efficacious in disseminated tuberculosis in children.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAntitubercular AgentsBacterial LoadCell LineChildComputer SimulationDrug AntagonismDrug SynergismDrug Therapy, CombinationFluoroquinolonesHumansLinezolidMicrobial Sensitivity TestsModels, TheoreticalMoxifloxacinMycobacterium tuberculosisAntitubercular AgentsFluoroquinolonesLinezolidMoxifloxacinadditivityBliss independencedisseminated tuberculosisexposure-response surfacehollow fiber system model

Identifiers

PMID27742639
PMCPMC5064154
OpenAlexW2531801166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.