ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2016
Macroporous acrylamide phantoms improve prediction of in vivo performance of in situ forming implants.
Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Ultra-long-acting injectable, biodegradable, and removable in-situ forming implant with cabotegravir for HIV prevention.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025Article
- Improving in vivo release prediction from in situ forming depots with a novel flow-through in vitro dissolution apparatus.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Cross Amplitude Modulation and Compound Amplitude Modulation for Nonlinear Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Nanobubbles.IEEE open journal of ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025Article
- Cryogels: Advancing Biomaterials for Transformative Biomedical Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Ultra-long-acting in-situ forming implants with cabotegravir protect female macaques against rectal SHIV infection.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Methodological Considerations in Development of UV Imaging for Characterization of Intra-Tumoral Injectables Using cAMP as a Model Substance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Tailored Doxycycline Hyclate Loaded In Situ Gel for the Treatment of Periodontitis: Optimization, In Vitro Characterization, and Antimicrobial Studies.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2021Article
- Increasing Distribution of Drugs Released from In Situ Forming PLGA Implants Using Therapeutic Ultrasound.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2017Article
- Predicting in vivo behavior of injectable, in situ-forming drug-delivery systems.Therapeutic delivery · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In situ forming implants (ISFIs) have shown promise as a sustained, local drug delivery system for therapeutics in a variety of applications. However, development of ISFIs has been hindered by poor correlation between in vitro study results and in vivo performance. In contrast to oral dosage forms, there is currently no clear consensus on a standard for in vitro drug dissolution studies for parenteral formulations. Recent studies have suggested that the disparity between in vivo and in vitro behavior of phase-inverting ISFIs may be, in part, due to differences in injection site stiffness. Accordingly, this study aimed to create acrylamide-based hydrogel phantoms of varying porosity and stiffness, which we hypothesized would better predict in vivo performance. Implant microstructure and shape were found to be dependent on the stiffness of the phantoms, while drug release was found to be dependent on both phantom porosity and stiffness. Specifically, SEM analysis revealed that implant porosity and interconnectivity decreased with increasing phantom stiffness and better mimicked the microstructure seen in vivo. Burst release of drug increased from 31% to 43% when in standard acrylamide phantoms vs macroporous phantoms (10kPa), improving the correlation to the burst release seen in vivo. Implants in 30kPa macroporous phantoms had the best correlation with in vivo burst release, significantly improving (p<0.05) the burst release relative to in vivo from 64%, using a standard PBS dissolution method, to 92%. These findings confirm that implant behavior is affected by injection site stiffness. Importantly, with appropriate optimization and validation, hydrogel phantoms such as the one investigated here could be used to improve the in vitro-in vivo correlation of in situ forming implant formulations and potentially augment their advancement to clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.