Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27741993›Full record

ReviewEmergency medicine clinics of North America2016

Diagnosis and Management of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Andrea Morotti, Joshua N Goldstein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emergency medicine clinics of North America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. An Established Early Rehabilitation Therapy Demonstrating Higher Efficacy and Safety for Care of Intensive Care Unit Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrea MorottiJ. P. Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 175 Cambridge Street, Suite 300, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Joshua N GoldsteinJ. P. Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 175 Cambridge Street, Suite 300, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Zero Emerson Place, Suite 3B, Boston, MA 02114, USA. Electronic address: jgoldstein@partners.org.

Funding

SCORE-IT: The CTA Spot Sign Score in Acute Cerebral HemorrhageR01NS073344 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ROSAND, JONATHAN · 2011 to 2015
$2.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the deadliest type of stroke and up to half of patients die in hospital. Blood pressure management, coagulopathy reversal, and intracranial pressure control are the mainstays of acute ICH treatment. Prevention of hematoma expansion and minimally invasive hematoma evacuation are promising therapeutic strategies under investigation. This article provides an updated review on ICH diagnosis and management in the emergency department.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseBrainCerebral HemorrhageComputed Tomography AngiographyEmergency Service, HospitalHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrognosisBlood pressureCoagulopathyHematoma expansionHemorrhagic strokeIntracerebral hemorrhageNeurocritical care

Identifiers

PMID27741993
PMCPMC5089075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.