ArticleGlobal heart2016
Charting the Future for Ethnicity and Health Research: Clinical and Population Science Insights From the MESA.
Article in Global heart, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Racial and Ethnic Differences in All-Cause and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: The MESA Study.Circulation · 2022Article
- Where we live: The impact of neighborhoods and community factors on cardiovascular health in the United States.Clinical cardiology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) has been highly successful in investigating the prevalence, characteristics, and progression of subclinical cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a multiethnic American cohort of adult men and women free of CVD at baseline. MESA has also championed the use of novel biomarkers and emerging imaging techniques for the assessment of subclinical CVD and has created an extensive set of data that continues to fuel dozens of ongoing analyses. Insights from MESA include the first demonstration of ethnic differences in coronary artery calcification and its association with subclinical disease progression and incident CVD. Other findings include ethnic differences in the prevalence of pharmacological, behavioral, and lifestyle interventions for the primary prevention of CVD. MESA has also shown the association between residential neighborhood characteristics and behavioral and biomedical risk factors for CVD. This vast amount of data documenting ethnic differences in progression of subclinical CVD, diabetes, kidney disease, and pulmonary disease contrasts sharply with the relative scarcity of specific information that can pave the way for the elimination of racial and ethnic disparities. Intervention research, however, goes beyond the original objectives of MESA and other observational studies. The time has now come to build on the legacy of MESA by supporting rigorous intervention research that informs clinical and public health strategies as well as policy and environmental changes for eliminating racial and ethnic disparities in CVD and other chronic diseases and advancing the health of multiethnic communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.