Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27741955›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2016

A mixed methods study of Canadian adolescents' perceptions of health.

Valerie Michaelson, William Pickett, Eleanor Vandemeer, Brian Taylor, Colleen Davison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The experience of adolescence process among French teenager pregnancies: a mixed-methods study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024
    Article
  3. Clustering of Six Key Risk Behaviors for Chronic Disease among Adolescent Females.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Valerie MichaelsonSchool of Religion, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Valerie.michaelson@queensu.ca.
William PickettDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Eleanor VandemeerDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Brian TaylorWestern University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Colleen DavisonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health perceptions adopted during childhood lay foundations for adult health trajectories and experiences. This study used a sequential mixed methods design to generate new evidence about child perceptions of health in two samples of Canadian children. A core qualitative study was followed by a complementary quantitative analysis to aid interpretation. Generational theory was used as a lens through which to interpret all data. Findings suggested that good health is perceived as customized and subjective. The strengths and liabilities of these perceptions are discussed, as well as implications for health promotion and prevention strategies. Through intentional consideration of the perspectives of this population group, this study makes both empirical and theoretical contributions to appreciating how cultural environments shape health perceptions.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthCultureFamily CharacteristicsPeer InfluenceAdolescentAdultCanadaChildFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMalePediatricsPerceptionQualitative ResearchSocial Environmentchild healthgenerational lensgenerational theorymixed methodsPediatricsperceptions of healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID27741955
PMCPMC5065693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.