Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27741950›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2016

Immune protection of chickens conferred by a vaccine consisting of attenuated strains of Salmonella Enteritidis, Typhimurium and Infantis.

Karolina Varmuzova, Marcela Faldynova, Marta Elsheimer-Matulova, Alena Sebkova, Ondrej Polansky, Hana Havlickova, Frantisek Sisak, Ivan Rychlik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Protection AgainstVaccines · 2026
    Article
  3. The probioticInfection and immunity · 2025
    Article
  4. Genetic engineering ofEcoSal Plus · 2024
    Review
  5. Pre-Harvest Non-TyphoidalAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Holistic Strategies to ControlMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Safety of theFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  10. Oral Deliverable Mucoadhesive Chitosan-International journal of nanomedicine · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Surface engineered polyanhydride-based oralInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karolina VarmuzovaVeterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
Marcela FaldynovaVeterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
Marta Elsheimer-MatulovaVeterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
Alena SebkovaVeterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
Ondrej PolanskyVeterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
Hana HavlickovaVeterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
Frantisek SisakVeterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
Ivan RychlikVeterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic. rychlik@vri.cz.
Veterinary Research Institute · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The colonization of poultry with different Salmonella enterica serovars poses an issue throughout the world. In this study we therefore tested the efficacy of a vaccine consisting of attenuated strains of Salmonella enterica serovars Enteritidis, Typhimurium and Infantis against challenge with the same serovars and with S. Agona, Dublin and Hadar. We tested oral and aerosol administration of the vaccine, with or without co-administration of cecal microbiota from adult hens. The protective effect was determined by bacterial counts of the challenge strains up to week 18 of life and by characterizing the immune response using real-time PCR specific for 16 different genes. We have shown that a vaccine consisting of attenuated S. Enteritidis, S. Typhimurium and S. Infantis protected chickens against challenge with the wild type strains of the same serovars and partially protected chickens also against challenge with isolates belonging to serovars Dublin or Hadar. Aerosol vaccination was more effective at inducing systemic immunity whilst oral vaccination stimulated a local immune response in the gut. Co-administration of cecal microbiota increased the protectiveness in the intestinal tract but slightly decreased the systemic immune response. Adjusting the vaccine composition and changing the administration route therefore affects vaccine efficacy.

Indexed as

AnimalsChickensMalePoultry DiseasesSalmonellaSalmonella enteritidisSalmonella Infections, AnimalSalmonella typhimuriumSalmonella VaccinesVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, CombinedSalmonella VaccinesVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, Combined

Identifiers

PMID27741950
PMCPMC5065701
OpenAlexW2519797939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.