Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27741367›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2017

Impact of smoking reduced nicotine content cigarettes on sensitivity to cigarette price: further results from a multi-site clinical trial.

Tracy T Smith, Rachel N Cassidy, Jennifer W Tidey, Xianghua Luo, Chap T Le, Dorothy K Hatsukami, Eric C Donny

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Regulatory Approaches and Implementation of Minimally Addictive Combusted Products.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Nicotine Reduction in Cigarettes: Literature Review and Gap Analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Standardized research electronic cigarette acceptability among adult men and women who smoke combustible cigarettes.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2025
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. The Impact of Reducing Nicotine Content on Adolescent Cigarette Smoking and Nicotine Exposure: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Trial
  11. Manipulation of Menthol and Nicotine Content in Cigarettes: Effects on Smoking Behavior and Toxicant Exposure in Women Menthol Smokers.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Impact of E-cigarette Sampling on Cigarette Dependence and Reinforcement Value.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  18. The Impact of Gradual and Immediate Nicotine Reduction on Subjective Cigarette Ratings.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Trial
  19. Randomized Trial of Low-Nicotine Cigarettes and Transdermal Nicotine.American journal of preventive medicine · 2019
    Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tracy T SmithUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4941-3768
Rachel N CassidyCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Jennifer W TideyCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Xianghua LuoDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Chap T LeDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Dorothy K HatsukamiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Eric C DonnyDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
University of Minnesota · USBrown University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · US

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Timothy C. Hallstrom · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
VERY LOW NICOTINE CIGARETTES IN SMOKERS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIAU54DA031659 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HECHT, STEPHEN S · 2011 to 2022
$64.7M
Translational Research Training in Cancer Prevention and ControlT32CA186873 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Kathryn H. Schmitz, Jian-Min Yuan · 2014 to 2026
$2.7M
Evaluation of Very Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes in Adolescent SmokersK01CA189300 · NCI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI CASSIDY, RACHEL N · 2014 to 2018
$897k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA189300NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NCI NIH HHS T32 CA186873NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA031659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo assess the impact of a reduction in the nicotine content of cigarettes on estimated consumption of reduced nicotine cigarettes and usual brand cigarettes at a variety of hypothetical prices.

designDouble-blind study with participants assigned randomly to receive cigarettes for 6 weeks that were either usual brand or an investigational cigarette with one of five nicotine contents.

settingTen sites across the United States.

participantsA total of 839 eligible adult smokers randomized from 2013 to 2014. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: Participants received their usual brand or an investigational cigarette with one of five nicotine contents: 15.8 (primary control), 5.2, 2.4, 1.3, or 0.4 mg/g. MEASUREMENTS: The Cigarette Purchase Task was completed at baseline and at the week 6 post-randomization visit.

findingsCompared with normal nicotine content controls, the lowest nicotine content (0.4 mg/g) reduced the number of study cigarettes participants estimated they would smoke at a range of prices [mean reduction relative to 15.8 mg/g at a price of $4.00/pack: 9.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 6.81,12.19]. The lowest nicotine content also reduced the maximum amount of money allocated to study cigarettes and the price at which participants reported they would stop buying study cigarettes [median reduction relative to 15.8 mg/g, 95% CI = $8.21 (4.27,12.15) per day and $0.44 (0.17,0.71) per cigarette, respectively]. A reduction in nicotine content to the lowest level also reduced the maximum amount of money allocated to usual brand cigarettes (median reduction relative to 15.8 mg/g: $4.39 per day, 95% CI = 1.88,6.90).

conclusionsIn current smokers, a reduction in nicotine content may reduce cigarette consumption, reduce the reinforcement value of cigarettes and increase cessation if reduced nicotine content cigarettes were the only cigarette available for purchase.

Indexed as

AdultCigarette SmokingCommerceDouble-Blind MethodHumansNicotineTobacco ProductsUnited StatesNicotineEnd gameharm reductionnicotinepublic policysmokingtaxation

Identifiers

PMID27741367
PMCPMC5233558
OpenAlexW2559005774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.