Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27741355›Full record

ArticleCancer2017

Multi-institutional experience of stereotactic body radiotherapy for large (≥5 centimeters) non-small cell lung tumors.

Vivek Verma, Valerie K Shostrom, Sameera S Kumar, Weining Zhen, Christopher L Hallemeier, Steve E Braunstein, John Holland, Matthew M Harkenrider, Adrian S Iskhanian, Hanmanth J Neboori and 12 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06542159 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Elimination of PTV Margins Based on Online Adaptive Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Early-stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer or Pulmonary Oligometastases: a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Phase II Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2024 to 2028Enrolled130ConditionsAdaptive Radiotherapy, Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Lung OligometastasesArmsOnline adaptive SBRT, Conventional SBRT
NCT06730295 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Elimination of PTV Margins Based on Online Adaptive Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Centrally Located Early-stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: a Prospective, Single-arm, Phase II Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2024 to 2028Enrolled52ConditionsLung Cancer (NSCLC)ArmsOnline adaptive SBRT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Dose coverage impacts local control in ultra-central lung oligometastases treated with stereotactic radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Salvage Therapy for Locoregional Recurrence After Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Early-Stage NSCLC.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Vivek VermaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Valerie K ShostromDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Sameera S KumarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Weining ZhenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
Christopher L HallemeierDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Steve E BraunsteinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
John HollandDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Matthew M HarkenriderDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois.
Adrian S IskhanianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida.
Hanmanth J NebooriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida.
Salma K JabbourDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Albert AttiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
Percy LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Fiori AliteDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois.
Joshua M WalkerDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
John M StahlDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Kyle WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Brian S BinghamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
Christina HadzitheodorouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Roy H DeckerDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Ronald C McGarryDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Charles B SimoneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
University of Nebraska Medical Center · USLoyola University Chicago · USOregon Health & Science University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Kentucky · USVanderbilt University · USYale University · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USMayo Clinic · USSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Dr. Salma Jabbour’s NCI Research Specialist (Clinician Scientist) Award (R50)R50CA275877 · NCI · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Salma Jabbour · 2023 to 2026
$785k
NCI NIH HHS R50 CA275877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the standard of care for patients with nonoperative, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) measuring < 5 cm, but its use among patients with tumors measuring ≥5 cm is considerably less defined, with the existing literature limited to small, single-institution reports. The current multi-institutional study reported outcomes evaluating the largest such population reported to date.

methodsClinical/treatment characteristics, outcomes, toxicities, and patterns of failure were assessed in patients with primary NSCLC measuring ≥5 cm without evidence of distant/lymph node metastasis who underwent SBRT using ≤5 fractions. Statistics included Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and univariate/multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.

resultsA total of 92 patients treated from 2004 through 2016 were analyzed from 12 institutions. The median follow-up was 12 months (15 months in survivors). The median age and tumor size among the patients were 73 years (range, 50-95 years) and 5.4 cm (range, 5.0-7.5 cm), respectively. The median dose/fractionation was 50 Gray/5 fractions. The actuarial local control rates at 1 year and 2 years were 95.7% and 73.2%, respectively. The disease-free survival rate was 72.1% and 53.5%, respectively, at 1 year and 2 years. The 1-year and 2-year disease-specific survival rates were 95.5% and 78.6%, respectively. The median, 1-year, and 2-year overall survival rates were 21.4 months, 76.2%, and 46.4%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, lung cancer history and pre-SBRT positron emission tomography maximum standardized uptake value were found to be associated with overall survival. Posttreatment failures were most commonly distant (33% of all disease recurrences), followed by local (26%) and those occurring elsewhere in the lung (23%). Three patients had isolated local failures. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities included 1 case (1%) and 4 cases (4%) of grade 3 dermatitis and radiation pneumonitis, respectively (toxicities were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0]). Grades 2 to 5 radiation pneumonitis occurred in 11% of patients. One patient with a tumor measuring 7.5 cm and a smoking history of 150 pack-years died of radiation pneumonitis.

conclusionsThe results of the current study, which is the largest study of patients with NSCLC measuring ≥5 cm reported to date, indicate that SBRT is a safe and efficacious option. Cancer 2017;123:688-696. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDisease-Free SurvivalDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalTreatment Outcomechemotherapyimage-guided radiotherapynon-small cell lung cancerstereotactic body radiotherapytoxicity

Identifiers

PMID27741355
PMCPMC10905610
OpenAlexW2537137666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.